I WUV YOU IANTO
Sep. 11th, 2009 09:58 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A brief post about LOVE, like I promised. Or more specifically, about "I love you" and Children of Earth. I've heard from one of GDL's panels at DragonCon that there was a reciprocal "I love you" in Ianto's death scene in Day Four, but it removed at the request of JB and GDL. You may be surprised to know that I am GODDAMN HAPPY about that. That scene was fucking awful, man. It made me cry, yes, Ianto was soon to be dead, but Christ what a cringeworthy sappy piece of shit scene that was. I was upset at the time that there WASN'T an "I love you" from Jack in that scene, I'll admit, but my actual upset wasn't about those words and that moment, it was about the fact that there wasn't anything even remotely approaching a relationship in which those words could have been spoken up until that scene.
What Children of Earth did, for me, above anything else, was tell me that I WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG. Way back when, when I started thinking that Jack/Ianto was a bit squicky, and I talked and I talked and I talked and people talked to me, and everyone started convincing each other that we should be reading between the lines and there was more to their emotional bond than we were being shown, all that stuff was thrown out the window in Days One to Four of Children of Earth. There wasn't. There hadn't been. And so all those thoughts I had back then, that Jack was essentially fucking an employee, not really giving anything back emotionally, despite the fact that that employee, who was younger, less experienced, emotionally broken and vulnerable, was very obviously falling in love with him, all that stuff was true. My inklings and instincts that Jack was being a user and was, in fact, a bit of a dick, that really was the case. Not only was there nothing going on, emotionally, in Series One or Two, but when that subject did start coming up in CoE, it was shot down, their interactions became hugely uncomfortable to watch, and a sudden redemption on that front on Ianto's deathbed did absolutely nothing to change that. Too little, too late. It made me hate Jack, far more than I'm sure it was meant to, but it did. I'm glad Jack didn't say "I love you", it would probably have made me hate him even more.
The reason all this stuff still bothers me is pretty simple. I had these bad feelings about Jack during S2 of Torchwood, this inkling that he used people and acted like an arsehole, and used his immortality as an excuse, in his own head, anyway, for how he treated mere mortals emotionally. For me, those feelings were confirmed in CoE when the big, climactic, dramatic drama happened. And the thing is, I have these same feelings about the Doctor. Well, no, not the Doctor, Ten, specifically. This niggling feeling that he's been acting like a dick, and that he uses his emo as an excuse to treat people like shit. In fact with the Doctor it's far less niggling, and far more blatant. I don't want to feel this way about the Doctor, and I'm very, very afraid that, as with Jack, these things will come into play in the final furlong. I DO NOT WANT.
I never really cared about the fact that I disliked Jack, Jack's not a big deal, but the Doctor? I watch this shit with my kid, man, I don't want to have him squeeing over monsters and sonic screwdrivers and TARDISes while I sit by on the sofa and fume and cringe and hate Ten. I don't want all this serious manpain in Who, and I certainly don't want these HINTS of serious manpain and emotional retardation to become CANON. I don't mind hints, I don't mind it when I can read things into this kiddie show, I like being given ambiguity and subtext, things to enjoy on another level while my child hides behind the sofa, that's all great, it's cool. Actual canonical emo and manpain and emotional manipulation? Not so much.
I hear a lot of people saying that it sounds like Moffat's tenure might be a bit much in the way of jelly babies and crappy monsters and silliness. GOOD. I, for one, cannot wait for this development. Bring it on. And Russell? Go make SRSDRAMA somewhere else. I won't be watching.
ETA: LOL, though. I've been criticising Russell T Davies for like two years now, and what was my major complaint about Jack/Ianto? It was Russell, you're not doing a very good job of showing us a relationship between two equals that isn't mildly emotionally abusive and isn't primarily about sex. I was totally wrong. He did a great job of showing us a relationship that wasn't between two equals, was mildly emotionally abusive and was primarily about sex. Russell is, in fact, very good at his job. Who would have thought?
What Children of Earth did, for me, above anything else, was tell me that I WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG. Way back when, when I started thinking that Jack/Ianto was a bit squicky, and I talked and I talked and I talked and people talked to me, and everyone started convincing each other that we should be reading between the lines and there was more to their emotional bond than we were being shown, all that stuff was thrown out the window in Days One to Four of Children of Earth. There wasn't. There hadn't been. And so all those thoughts I had back then, that Jack was essentially fucking an employee, not really giving anything back emotionally, despite the fact that that employee, who was younger, less experienced, emotionally broken and vulnerable, was very obviously falling in love with him, all that stuff was true. My inklings and instincts that Jack was being a user and was, in fact, a bit of a dick, that really was the case. Not only was there nothing going on, emotionally, in Series One or Two, but when that subject did start coming up in CoE, it was shot down, their interactions became hugely uncomfortable to watch, and a sudden redemption on that front on Ianto's deathbed did absolutely nothing to change that. Too little, too late. It made me hate Jack, far more than I'm sure it was meant to, but it did. I'm glad Jack didn't say "I love you", it would probably have made me hate him even more.
The reason all this stuff still bothers me is pretty simple. I had these bad feelings about Jack during S2 of Torchwood, this inkling that he used people and acted like an arsehole, and used his immortality as an excuse, in his own head, anyway, for how he treated mere mortals emotionally. For me, those feelings were confirmed in CoE when the big, climactic, dramatic drama happened. And the thing is, I have these same feelings about the Doctor. Well, no, not the Doctor, Ten, specifically. This niggling feeling that he's been acting like a dick, and that he uses his emo as an excuse to treat people like shit. In fact with the Doctor it's far less niggling, and far more blatant. I don't want to feel this way about the Doctor, and I'm very, very afraid that, as with Jack, these things will come into play in the final furlong. I DO NOT WANT.
I never really cared about the fact that I disliked Jack, Jack's not a big deal, but the Doctor? I watch this shit with my kid, man, I don't want to have him squeeing over monsters and sonic screwdrivers and TARDISes while I sit by on the sofa and fume and cringe and hate Ten. I don't want all this serious manpain in Who, and I certainly don't want these HINTS of serious manpain and emotional retardation to become CANON. I don't mind hints, I don't mind it when I can read things into this kiddie show, I like being given ambiguity and subtext, things to enjoy on another level while my child hides behind the sofa, that's all great, it's cool. Actual canonical emo and manpain and emotional manipulation? Not so much.
I hear a lot of people saying that it sounds like Moffat's tenure might be a bit much in the way of jelly babies and crappy monsters and silliness. GOOD. I, for one, cannot wait for this development. Bring it on. And Russell? Go make SRSDRAMA somewhere else. I won't be watching.
ETA: LOL, though. I've been criticising Russell T Davies for like two years now, and what was my major complaint about Jack/Ianto? It was Russell, you're not doing a very good job of showing us a relationship between two equals that isn't mildly emotionally abusive and isn't primarily about sex. I was totally wrong. He did a great job of showing us a relationship that wasn't between two equals, was mildly emotionally abusive and was primarily about sex. Russell is, in fact, very good at his job. Who would have thought?
no subject
Date: 2009-09-11 10:49 am (UTC)For me, the lack of mutual ILUs saved the scene from descending entirely into cheesy, OTT melodrama, because sometimes people don't say what they ought to say right when they should, and then it's too late, and such is life (and death). I think less is often more in these scenes which are meant to be both sad and beautiful, and it gave the whole scene a bittersweet edge. Far more meaning and sadness and poignancy was packed into that "Don't!" than could have gone into a cliche ILU.
Also, IMHO, deathbed ILUs have limited value anyway - if Jack had said it at that point, I still might not have believed him. I think they did love each other on some level, but theirs wasn't storybook romantic love, and I'm glad it didn't end like that.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-11 12:54 pm (UTC)For me, I'd have been more emotionally satisfied if the fucked-up angle had been played up more, their tension and discomfort with each other had been allowed to grow, and then Ianto had gone off somewhere to do something brave or heroic or foolish without Jack and been shot in the face, bam, dead. Leaving Jack with nothing and leaving everything unsaid. The clichéd soap-opera deathbed thing did absolutely nothing for me in the way of hammering home mortality and missed opportunities or whatever it was that RTD says he was trying to get across.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-11 12:11 pm (UTC)Jack was essentially fucking an employee, not really giving anything back emotionally, despite the fact that that employee,...interactions became hugely uncomfortable to watch
This is the main reason I never got fully behind the pairing and one of the reasons I hate the character of Jack (the other reason is JB's 'actoring' :/).
But that said, I do think that there were feelings there on Jack's side, while it wasn't love, I do think that there was some affection for Ianto bc the sex could not have been 'that' good.
Jack was just too broken to give Ianto what he needed and Ianto was too damaged to leave. They both got either too complacent or just neither of them wanted it bad enough.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-11 12:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-11 06:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-11 12:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-11 01:29 pm (UTC)Well, I had those thoughts too, though I like complicated feelings and motives in onscreen relationships not the Disney romance stuff.
It's my own bias about pairings in entertainment showing, but I prefer UST and weird motives on both sides to "ILU!" "OMG ILU TOO!" After that happens, I'm totally bored with the couple. OHAI MULDER AND SCULLY.
Like Santousha, I would have liked it if Ianto dumped Jack, too. At first, it would have been exciting to be with Jack and reassuring after Lisa (to be with someone invincible) but I would have liked him to love Jack, find that Jack was holding out emotionally because of his past, find someone else (whomever replaced Tosh or Owen, probably) and tell Jack, "Dude, me with you? Not really healthy for me. No hard feelings, but thanks for confirming that I'm bi!" Then Jack would be butthurt for a while and it would've been LOL watching him. I like the dynamic of exes working together, too.
That would have been deliciously uncomfortable!
Huh. I think I might write this.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-11 01:35 pm (UTC)That would have made for such a great entire fourth series. Plus, it would have got rid of that unspoken vibe that's there in Torchwood that Jack's cock is just the greatest thing since sliced bread. Ianto could have been all "It's just a cock, Jack. I've had better. You're a bit full of yourself and have a tendency to preen and pretend you're on camera" and we would have lolled all over the place. DAMN YOU SHOW!!!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-11 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-11 02:26 pm (UTC)I'm going back to forgetting CoE and waiting for Moffat's Doctor.
Also, as much as I love Janto, I agree with the above people and say it would have been fun to watch Ianto dumping Jack's ass.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-11 02:47 pm (UTC)Me too. CoE was just so weird and AU like that it's easy for me to forgot.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-11 02:57 pm (UTC)""For me, I'd have been more emotionally satisfied if the fucked-up angle had been played up more, their tension and discomfort with each other had been allowed to grow, and then Ianto had gone off somewhere to do something brave or heroic or foolish without Jack and been shot in the face, bam, dead. Leaving Jack with nothing and leaving everything unsaid.""
I agree with this too. It's like RTD couldn't decide whether to have Jack and Ianto as an OTP type of couple or a totally fu**** up type of couple. He just took little bits from both types of relationship, leaving us feeling confused and unsatisfied.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-11 03:15 pm (UTC)I think that RTD actually saw Jack/Ianto as a OTP. When he tries to write OTP the relationships are always screwed up, with one person having all the power (in this case Jack) and the other not having any (Ianto). Just look at Doctor 10/Rose
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:On people dying young in Torchwood
From:Re: On people dying young in Torchwood
From:Re: On people dying young in Torchwood
From:Re: On people dying young in Torchwood
From:Re: On people dying young in Torchwood
From:Why does the POV character have immunity anyways?
From:Re: Why does the POV character have immunity anyways?
From:Re: Why does the POV character have immunity anyways?
From:Re: Why does the POV character have immunity anyways?
From:Re: Why does the POV character have immunity anyways?
From:Re: Why does the POV character have immunity anyways?
From:Re: Why does the POV character have immunity anyways?
From:Re: Why does the POV character have immunity anyways?
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-11 05:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-11 06:24 pm (UTC)Any signs of affection from Jack to Ianto in CoE were very slight and very rare. On the contrary, there were numerous signs of indifference and disrespectful behaviour from Jack towards Ianto (remember when he *yells* at Ianto to tell him the names of the people who were involved in the 456 cover-up decades ago?). If RTD thought this was a portrayal of 'true love' I have to wonder if he is mentally disturbed.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-11 07:22 pm (UTC)I read a comment the other day about a RTD's interview given at the time of QAF in which he was dismissing of people who liked Vince better over Stuart. Apparently he was surprised that 'people don't understand how awesome Stuart is and waste their time on pathetic Vince who is such a liar'.
Does this remind you of something? Ianto being made a liar so that Jack (and Gwen of course) can be even more awesome by comparison?
He probably thinks that shallow fuckers are incredibly sexy. I wouldn't be surprised if he'd made Jack into a cross between Stuart and Christian Troy from now on... Who was that gave that definition for Jack? An empty carcass with an attached dick. I think we will see that very soon, as in Coming this Christmas on your TV screen!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-11 08:03 pm (UTC)Not me. I think he just wanted to have it both ways (based on his reasoning for Jack's prolicide) and did a shit job all around.
But, since most fans care far more for Jack than Ianto, it gets a pass. The ratings are all that really matters, after all...
(There was SO much wrong with The Death Scene, that one inconguent ILU, more or less, would have made very little difference, imo.)
no subject
Date: 2009-09-11 08:03 pm (UTC)Death scene -- yes, stupid. I especially like GDL saying he worked to get the ILU changed because he wanted it to be "pointless and a waste" as opposed to "sweeping". which is funny, because what I saw was a big ol' Romeo and Juliet death scene, which actually seemed out of the style of the rest of CoE.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-11 08:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-12 03:01 am (UTC)Your point of him being demanding, somewhat abusive in addition to a whole lot of crap to Ianto is reasonable (everyone has made good points in this discussion).
I see the relationship between the two men as dysfunction, co-dependent since both are a bit fucked up. Their relationship seems to feed something they both need-face it to work for TW, you have to be fucked up to a point.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-12 08:41 am (UTC)onlyfavourite show at the moment, so reading what you've written wasn't quite as uncomfortable as it could have been.What makes it uncomfortable is that I agree with what you've said about Jack, and because I do, I feel I have to take a giant step back from what I have personally built up about the two characters.
I never thought it was 'tuw wuv' but I was very happy to think that it had become some kind of love on both sides, even if it was unbalanced and probably very convoluted.
Now that I'm seeing it in your light, it also throws cold water on all the truly wonderful, well-written Jack/Ianto stories out there, because for a story to be great for me it has to reflect what I see in canon ... and if my perception of canon is shifting ....
I'd be really depressed right around now if I wasn't feeling quite emotionally detached from TW ATM.
This may have been touched on in the comments above - I haven't read them all - but - and I hesitate to ask this in my out-loud voice because it borders on sacrilegious - do you think, on some level, Jack may have been relieved that Ianto was killed off by the 456? Once he got over the shock of it, and of having caused it-- oh! Oh. Could he have actually meant to take Ianto into a deadly situation?????
no subject
Date: 2009-09-12 11:52 am (UTC)Not the same thing, but throughout the scene with Lois in the boardroom, to Ianto handing Jack a gun. it almost felt to me as if Ianto was so pissed off with Jack (over Jack's failures to confide in him) that he intentionally marched to his death.
I guess what I picked up on was meant to be building momentum for the Crowning Moment of Awesome that backfired, so to speak, but really I had a feeling it was just not going to go well all along, and when Ianto told his sister "I love you," I knew he was a goner. And strangely it seemed as if he knew it, too. I think that was odd, because really I can't see what reason he had to think he would die. I dunno. Maybe he just hoped he would. (I know, this makes no sense.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-12 09:57 am (UTC)The Dead Line has some deep emotional affection (i.e. love) being pretty explicitly returned by Jack towards Ianto. Taking the plays as canon and making the logical leap that the events of The Dead Line happened the week before CoE, I'm inclined to say that the awkwardness we witness in the pair is due to the fact that these two emotionally stunted/vulnerable people who basically confessed their love to each other and don't really know how to handle that. Add in the whole way their relationship developed (not healthy) and the fact that the hierarchy of their positions remain central to their interpersonal relationship. Given his reaction when Dr. Patanjali makes an assumption about their relationship, Ianto's clearly uncomfortable with people outside Torchwood knowing that he's with Jack. After that point Jack follows Ianto's lead in defining it. With all this evidence of a deeply emotional dynamic, I don't how you make the leap that there is no love coming from Jack, ever, at all.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-12 03:28 pm (UTC)I don't think the radio plays (and Captain's Blog, etc) can really count so much as evidence, or at least, as very strong evidence. The radio plays were recorded long after CoE was filmed and did not get even a fraction of the advertising that CoE got. Many fans do not seem to have heard of them yet. And amongst the general non-fannish public I am sure there will be few who would have heard of them and listened to them. They (and Dead Line in particular) seem to have been a way to throw a bone to devoted fans and to people who were interested in the Jack/Ianto pairing. Certainly there was much more relationship information in the few minutes of Ianto's monologue than there was in all of S1,S2 and S3 combined.
The thing is, if we're meant to count plays like Dead Line as canon (and there is a strong case to count them as canon), then why could they not have been made more visible and mainstream? Or failing that, why could not the same concepts and ideas be presented on the TV show itself? Because if a person without internet access or without knowledge of the radio broadcasts watched nothing but the TV series of Torchwood, they would have to conclude what [Bad username or site: tencrush lj-user @ livejournal.com] is saying here.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-12 05:28 pm (UTC)No matter what was stated in the plays and blog, nothing can alter the fact that their relationship in CoE was at an awkward stage, which, given the things that happened before seemed to a backwards progression. Jack's reluctance to give Ianto even a hint of affection was odd and, to me, seemed out of character.
Having said all that, I have great difficulty seeing Children of Earth in any other way than how it was written, and that was as a standalone production for a new audience, and viewing it as that, not knowing anything that's gone before, Jack is fucking cold towards a stereotypical infatuated, awkward gay boy, pure and simple.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: