And seriously, guys...
Jun. 3rd, 2008 04:00 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
SHE'S HIS FUCKING WIFE!!
She's not Rose, she's not Jenny, she's not the Rani, she's not Romana. River Song is the Doctor's wife from the future. She's going to die in the next episode. He will spend all that time with her, doing all that funstuff in her diary, knowing precisely how and when she will inevitably die.
Paradoxes, inevitability, fate, curse of a Time Lord... Jesus Christ to hear fandom talking you'd think they'd never seen a Moffat episode before.
EDITED TO ADD SOMETHING I POSTED IN THE COMMENTS: I don't understand what everyone's so worked up about, she's not the next companion, she's his lover/wife from some point in the future. We'll more than likely never see her again. It's about time travel and the weirdness involved. It's about the Doctor losing the woman he loves, BEFORE HE LOVES HER. It's about her dying in the arms of a man WHO DOESN'T LOVE HER YET. It's a timey-wimey Moffat story, nothing more.
Moffat's apparent fascination with the mechanics of time travel make me tremendously excited about his tenure as boss. I think if Moffat does go for any sort of overriding story arc, it will be far more clever than Rusty's namechecking "Torchwood" every bloody episode, and will probably deal with the same themes he seems so fond of, fixed history, inevitability of events, consequences of past and future actions. I'm excited about Moffat, really I am.
She's not Rose, she's not Jenny, she's not the Rani, she's not Romana. River Song is the Doctor's wife from the future. She's going to die in the next episode. He will spend all that time with her, doing all that funstuff in her diary, knowing precisely how and when she will inevitably die.
Paradoxes, inevitability, fate, curse of a Time Lord... Jesus Christ to hear fandom talking you'd think they'd never seen a Moffat episode before.
EDITED TO ADD SOMETHING I POSTED IN THE COMMENTS: I don't understand what everyone's so worked up about, she's not the next companion, she's his lover/wife from some point in the future. We'll more than likely never see her again. It's about time travel and the weirdness involved. It's about the Doctor losing the woman he loves, BEFORE HE LOVES HER. It's about her dying in the arms of a man WHO DOESN'T LOVE HER YET. It's a timey-wimey Moffat story, nothing more.
Moffat's apparent fascination with the mechanics of time travel make me tremendously excited about his tenure as boss. I think if Moffat does go for any sort of overriding story arc, it will be far more clever than Rusty's namechecking "Torchwood" every bloody episode, and will probably deal with the same themes he seems so fond of, fixed history, inevitability of events, consequences of past and future actions. I'm excited about Moffat, really I am.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 02:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 03:16 am (UTC)And they will twist the shit out of that knife when its in her because they will also talk about him not being the last of the Time Lords or alone or the Master in a woman's body or some shit like that, and it will hurt us significantly as soon as it happens and again in future episodes, where the possibility of seeing her again will be ridiculously hard and bittersweet.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:16 am (UTC)Not with Rose coming back and having to deal with that again too it's all just too much for my taste.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:40 am (UTC)And I don't really see what Rose has to do with anything. I mean, there's shipping Ten/Rose and then there's being weirdly delusional and thinking River Song is The Master in disguise.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:25 am (UTC)I think that this is it. It's a nice little mindfuck and gives us copious emo!Ten.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:42 am (UTC)It was just a joke, really. I don't think that's at all possible. I'm just wondering if there's something else she could be, but apparently I'm in the minority.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:50 am (UTC)*grins*
Thank you for not being another anti-River post!
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:57 am (UTC)Also, I think she's fantastic. What's with all the hating that's going on?!
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 05:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Foolish children!
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 05:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 05:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 06:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 06:22 am (UTC)I was just happy that Moffat was dealing with time travel in an interesting way yet again, which is something that isn't dealt with often enough in a series about a time traveler.
I really hope she is his wife, because I love Alex Kingston and can't wait to see her return - and meet The Doctor for the first time. Frankly,
next Saturday2010 cannot come quickly enough!no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 06:53 am (UTC)I'd bet all the money in my pockets against all the money in your pockets we never see her again.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 08:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 07:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 07:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:He doesn't handle loss well.
From:Re: He doesn't handle loss well.
From:Re: He doesn't handle loss well.
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 07:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 08:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 08:43 am (UTC)In before Silence in the Library denial starts to surface. "Oh, I like to pretend that after TUATW they went straight to Midnight."
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 08:38 am (UTC)People can ship Rose/Ten all they want, but it's getting out of hand when any female character who goes near the Doctor is accused of being (actual quote!) "an evil manipulative liar." I wasn't particularly taken by River, but I feel like people aren't giving her a chance at all. How are you supposed to enjoy a show if you perceive everyone as a 'threat' to your ship? So odd!
Besides, I love the idea of this incredibly tragic and poignant love that begins and ends in the same episode but exists outside of it as well. It's very clever! And I'm generally ANTI-Doctoromance, but it's still intriguing and could be potentially done well.
Of course, my personal crack canon is that yes, she's his wife - BUT ALSO SHE'S FUTURE!JACK. Jack -> River -> ??? -> Boeface! I mean, it just seems OBVIOUS. ;)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 08:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 09:29 am (UTC)Seeing as Ten is such an emo ball of masochism, the fact that River Song is very likely to die during his first meeting with her, I think, makes it make more sense that he would get caught up in that relationship, whether or not he intends to do so. In a way, I suppose, it'd almost like he got all the hurt out right at the beginning--he's seen her die, so he knows that any more meetings will be all wibbly wobbly timey wimey and not end in her dying (well, probably. I'm sure he could always inadvertently create a horrible paradox if he was careless).
Anyway, I'm mostly wondering what "saved" means, and worrying about Donna. Not going to go around reading the speculations, though. I already regret reading the River Song spoilers and not getting to just find out when I saw it.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 03:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 09:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 10:52 am (UTC)River Song hasn't grabbed my interest as a character, honestly I'd forget her existence in two seconds if people weren't still talking about her. I'm more focused on wondering if there's any chance they might surprise me and Donna might actually be dead, and future appearances could be an alt!Donna from Rose's world.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 12:09 pm (UTC)i'll guess she dies in his arms because she'll throw herself in harms way to make sure he lives to meet her in the future...
Moffat at the helm could be incredible, it could also be frustrating as all get out- but at least it won't be filled with "aren't we so clever" moments ala RTD.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 12:25 pm (UTC)THAT'S VERY DEPRESSING.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 02:55 pm (UTC)Come on. Book of his history? Calling it "spoilers", which is his rule? Told Donna basically the same thing about the biographies? Who else would know so much about his life? Who else, but an archeologist, could possibly write it?
Sure, she could be married to him at some point, or whatever, but that doesn't really matter. The fact is, she's his biographer, and that's what's going to be important for the next episode.
Also, consider this; constantly throughout this season, it's been empisised about time being stable or in flux. Events can, and probably will, change.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 03:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 03:07 pm (UTC):D
I totally agree about the thrill of Moff taking on the mechanics of time travel. A series about a time traveller that explores the astonishing possibilities and paradoxes of time travel. Imagine!
(I am, and its gonna be brilliant...)