And seriously, guys...
Jun. 3rd, 2008 04:00 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
SHE'S HIS FUCKING WIFE!!
She's not Rose, she's not Jenny, she's not the Rani, she's not Romana. River Song is the Doctor's wife from the future. She's going to die in the next episode. He will spend all that time with her, doing all that funstuff in her diary, knowing precisely how and when she will inevitably die.
Paradoxes, inevitability, fate, curse of a Time Lord... Jesus Christ to hear fandom talking you'd think they'd never seen a Moffat episode before.
EDITED TO ADD SOMETHING I POSTED IN THE COMMENTS: I don't understand what everyone's so worked up about, she's not the next companion, she's his lover/wife from some point in the future. We'll more than likely never see her again. It's about time travel and the weirdness involved. It's about the Doctor losing the woman he loves, BEFORE HE LOVES HER. It's about her dying in the arms of a man WHO DOESN'T LOVE HER YET. It's a timey-wimey Moffat story, nothing more.
Moffat's apparent fascination with the mechanics of time travel make me tremendously excited about his tenure as boss. I think if Moffat does go for any sort of overriding story arc, it will be far more clever than Rusty's namechecking "Torchwood" every bloody episode, and will probably deal with the same themes he seems so fond of, fixed history, inevitability of events, consequences of past and future actions. I'm excited about Moffat, really I am.
She's not Rose, she's not Jenny, she's not the Rani, she's not Romana. River Song is the Doctor's wife from the future. She's going to die in the next episode. He will spend all that time with her, doing all that funstuff in her diary, knowing precisely how and when she will inevitably die.
Paradoxes, inevitability, fate, curse of a Time Lord... Jesus Christ to hear fandom talking you'd think they'd never seen a Moffat episode before.
EDITED TO ADD SOMETHING I POSTED IN THE COMMENTS: I don't understand what everyone's so worked up about, she's not the next companion, she's his lover/wife from some point in the future. We'll more than likely never see her again. It's about time travel and the weirdness involved. It's about the Doctor losing the woman he loves, BEFORE HE LOVES HER. It's about her dying in the arms of a man WHO DOESN'T LOVE HER YET. It's a timey-wimey Moffat story, nothing more.
Moffat's apparent fascination with the mechanics of time travel make me tremendously excited about his tenure as boss. I think if Moffat does go for any sort of overriding story arc, it will be far more clever than Rusty's namechecking "Torchwood" every bloody episode, and will probably deal with the same themes he seems so fond of, fixed history, inevitability of events, consequences of past and future actions. I'm excited about Moffat, really I am.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 02:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 03:16 am (UTC)And they will twist the shit out of that knife when its in her because they will also talk about him not being the last of the Time Lords or alone or the Master in a woman's body or some shit like that, and it will hurt us significantly as soon as it happens and again in future episodes, where the possibility of seeing her again will be ridiculously hard and bittersweet.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:16 am (UTC)Not with Rose coming back and having to deal with that again too it's all just too much for my taste.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:25 am (UTC)I think that this is it. It's a nice little mindfuck and gives us copious emo!Ten.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:40 am (UTC)And I don't really see what Rose has to do with anything. I mean, there's shipping Ten/Rose and then there's being weirdly delusional and thinking River Song is The Master in disguise.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:42 am (UTC)It was just a joke, really. I don't think that's at all possible. I'm just wondering if there's something else she could be, but apparently I'm in the minority.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:48 am (UTC)Ha! You've hit the problem right on the nose!
The Doctor gets beaten up and we fans get a growing list of things to be afraid of... gas masks, the word mummy, the ticking of clocks, statues, shadows...
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:50 am (UTC)*grins*
Thank you for not being another anti-River post!
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:57 am (UTC)Also, I think she's fantastic. What's with all the hating that's going on?!
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 05:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 05:00 am (UTC)I agree, but I think it's disrespectful to the other companions that appeared in this series to give us River Song and then take her away for however long. Next series isn't really a series. It's just a couple of special episodes, you know? It's just confusing and complicated and part of me thinks Moffat wanted it this way to keep us talking about these spoilers as opposed to those for the finale.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 05:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 05:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 05:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 05:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 05:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 05:07 am (UTC)