tencrush: (Default)
[personal profile] tencrush
The world of kink is rather like fandom in very many ways and is full of People Being Right About Stuff whilst Other People Are Wrong. For reasons I shall not be getting into I ventured to some strange sekrit places on the interwebs but funnily enough ended up at Towleroad ("All Gay News (and pictures of Zac Efron) All The Time!") where I caught this exchange:

Anon @ 3:46? WTF?

Tops wear chaps all the time--chaps, codpieces, vests, gauntlets, whatever. We like the feel of leather on ourselves and other guys.

You don't know what the f*ck you're talking about.


Posted by: leathertop | Sep 4, 2007 8:05:05 PM

#

Leathertop

BS

You probably own a poodle and work in a flower shop besides being a "top unless a worhty man comes along"

leather is drag without the heels.

This s/m submissive has met your kind before and probably topped you.

If a man wears leather then you can bet he bottoms


Posted by: anon | Sep 4, 2007 9:10:31 PM

#

PS

Real tops don't wear leather because they don't need to boost themselves with illusion.

20+ years in the s/m dom/sub community and never met a real top who wore leather.


Posted by: anon | Sep 4, 2007 9:12:43 PM

#

You're so cute ANON. I love it when leather-nerds like you start lecturing others that you know all the rules to *every* leatehr community in existence. You sound like an autistic trekkie.

Posted by: ray | Sep 4, 2007 10:03:52 PM

#

These days hardly anyone still wears leather in any kind of social situation like bars. There's like 1/2 of a leather bar in all of NYC now. He better hurry! I'm not really up on this stuff--has it all gone underground with the Internet or simply disappeared??

As to the photo, I am once again repulsed by what Photoshop can do to a person's appearance. He's much better looking than that. The hair doesn't help either.


Posted by: anon (gmail.com) | Sep 4, 2007 11:07:30 PM

#

Thanks ray

Now go feed your poodle and go to sleep because you have an early day at the flower shop.

:-)


Posted by: anon | Sep 4, 2007 11:20:42 PM


The photo they are referring to is, of course, one of John Barrowman.

None of this has anything to do with anything, of course, but it amused me so there. As you were.

Date: 2009-02-15 02:24 pm (UTC)
ext_3370: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iko.livejournal.com
YES. I find that really annoying.

Date: 2009-02-15 07:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] louisema.livejournal.com
See previous posts from Whelk for more details :D there was one a while ago about that.

Profile

tencrush: (Default)
tencrush

November 2020

S M T W T F S
12 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 07:42 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios