And now... a quiz!
Jan. 13th, 2009 04:12 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
TORCHWOODIAN FANNISH VENNISH DIAGRAM, INSTALLMENT THE FIRST:
Gwack and Janto fangirls in venn-diagrammatic form.

QUESTION ONE: Using the following supposition, find a value for A, B, C and D.
Supposition:
Jack/Gwen shippers like to pretend that John Barrowman is just a little bit straight. For them.
[Poll #1330387]
QUESTION TWO:
IS HERE
Gwack and Janto fangirls in venn-diagrammatic form.
QUESTION ONE: Using the following supposition, find a value for A, B, C and D.
Supposition:
Jack/Gwen shippers like to pretend that John Barrowman is just a little bit straight. For them.
[Poll #1330387]
QUESTION TWO:
IS HERE
no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 03:30 pm (UTC)*weeps*
no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 03:38 pm (UTC)I lost the point, sorry.
(Also, I hope you don't mind me friending you or commenting or sth ;O)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 03:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 03:50 pm (UTC)I'm not sure it's confined to Jack/Gwen shippers (I've met plenty of Jack/Ianto shippers with a tangible lust for teh Barrowman), but fandom for a gay man will always have a subset who fantasize they can "turn him." Some of them keep these fantasies in their heads, where they are welcome. Others (just attend a con, panto, or concert sometime) put quite a lot of effort (with, ah, varying results) into looking "hot/pretty/sexy" for JB, a man who on national television was scientifically shown as not aroused by naked female pornstars, never mind your very average fangirl.
That being said, plenty of similarly genetically ungifted fans do the same for Gareth. I would say they have no chance, since he's hot and his gf is rather pretty, but then all bets are off if he's had some booze. Never know who he will snog.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 03:52 pm (UTC)LOLOLOLOLOL.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 04:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 08:42 am (UTC)Not to mention twice his age.
And on the other side of the planet.
Okay, now completely depressed . . .
no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 03:59 pm (UTC)I like Jack/Ianto because it's written on the screen, and you'd be a fool to deny that it's even there. EQUALLY, even though I don't *ship* Jack/Gwen, I do realise why people *do*, because..yup, it's WRITTEN, it's THERE and if you don't see that it's there, then you're obviously watching a different show to everyone else.
Jack and Gwen can't ever happen. Gwen realised this in the time Jack had disappeared, because..Jack could do that *anytime*. He could just bugger off and leave her. That's why I think she threw herself completely to Rhys. He would always be there for her, never leave her. She realised this even more so in 'Meat'. So she didn't "settle" for him, she just...realised what she had, and came to terms with it. She could never have Jack in the way that she wanted, because eventually, he could just leave her. She knows what he's like, and he could leave. But, they do have a relationship, and an understanding.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 04:24 pm (UTC)I've no doubt about that! I am not anti-Gwen. I like her, actually. I don't think she and Jack would work, but it would be hard to deny there is an attraction of some sort.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 04:27 pm (UTC)Oh man, I could deconstruct this dynamic in the Team all day!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 04:02 pm (UTC)Ah, yes, the diagram is missing the overlapping circle of "Fangirls who like to pretend they could turn JB straight". This is what happens when one diagramatically represents disparate groups such as these. I said all A were B, but did not claim all B were A, you see.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 04:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 06:26 pm (UTC)It was Duchovny. Unngh!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 07:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 08:17 pm (UTC)MAH HED HURTS OF MAFFS NAO!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 12:38 am (UTC)ETA: wait, I totally screwed up why D is Jack/Ianto, since different bits of it also include 'people who only fancy John', 'people who only fancy Gareth' and 'people who fancy neither'. This bodes well for the class I'm teaching on Thursday.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-14 12:54 am (UTC)Surely a statistically insignificant number of people?
I would like to meet these people (or possibly only "this person"). I've never met a real pervert.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 11:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 09:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-13 10:52 pm (UTC)