Unpopular? Yeah.
Jul. 25th, 2008 10:11 amEveryone on my flist is posting their unpopular Whovian opinions again.
I've only got one: I PRAY TO THE GODS THAT THIS IS TRUE. I don't like Freema, I think she's an awful actress, I think she did a bad job in Who (admittedly the writing wasn't much better) and I think she did an awful job in Torchwood (again, writing, yes). And I was oh so ready and willing to love Martha when Martha first happened, honestly I was. But series three did absolutely nothing for me, and Freema's utter inability to sell me on this character was a large part of what made me almost turn off come the end. The idea of her joining the cast of Torchwood has made me lie awake at night, shuddering.
People are always accusing the Sun of selling bullshit, but in actual fact the Sun's Whovian reports have, on the whole, usually been correct. Full of hyperbole and overly dramatic bullshit, but essentially correct. I am hoping fervently that this is the case.
ETA: CONFIRMATION ON TELETEXT. Phew.
I've only got one: I PRAY TO THE GODS THAT THIS IS TRUE. I don't like Freema, I think she's an awful actress, I think she did a bad job in Who (admittedly the writing wasn't much better) and I think she did an awful job in Torchwood (again, writing, yes). And I was oh so ready and willing to love Martha when Martha first happened, honestly I was. But series three did absolutely nothing for me, and Freema's utter inability to sell me on this character was a large part of what made me almost turn off come the end. The idea of her joining the cast of Torchwood has made me lie awake at night, shuddering.
People are always accusing the Sun of selling bullshit, but in actual fact the Sun's Whovian reports have, on the whole, usually been correct. Full of hyperbole and overly dramatic bullshit, but essentially correct. I am hoping fervently that this is the case.
ETA: CONFIRMATION ON TELETEXT. Phew.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 09:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 09:10 am (UTC)(Conversely, I CONVINCED myself Catherine Tate was going to be AWFUL and ruin Who for me for good. And she was so brilliant I still can't quite believe it.)
no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 09:37 am (UTC)Tate was > all of them, though.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 08:04 pm (UTC)I whole heartily agree that.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 09:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 10:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 10:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 11:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 01:46 pm (UTC)I don't mind her on DW because I seldom watch Tennant!Who, but she didn't fit in TW. AT ALL.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 02:03 pm (UTC)As a fan of hers (I know! I don't think she's a great actress or anything, but I enjoy her work generally -- I went in thinking she'd be shit and being pleasantly surprised that she was mostly OK, though, which probably colours it), I am pissed off. Not about her not being in Torchwood, 'cos judging by the S2 eps they're two great tastes that don't taste great together, but because I thought I had seen the back of having to watch Chibnall's "writing" once he'd left and yet I can totally see myself watching the new Law and Order because of her.
And thingy off of BSG maybe.*oppresses you mildly with Martha icon*
no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 02:45 pm (UTC)I really wanted to like her, and she just left me completely unmoved. The writing was pretty bad, and in the hands of someone more talented maybe Marthe could have gone somewhere, but, for me, Freema just wasn't shiny enough to breathe life into such a blandly written character. And she really didn't work in Torchwood. At all.
Law & Order will be SO BAD, I reckon. I don't think Chibnall's up to the job.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 03:02 pm (UTC)The one thing I am concerned about is that Torchwood will apparently have a large cast. I think a show should ideally have no more than five or six main characters, and what I liked a lot about seasons 1 and 2 is that the main cast was so small, with very few recurring supporting characters, that we really got to spend a lot of time with our characters in a claustrophobic environment, while still being kept at enough distance from them to not really know much about them either, which created this balance of growing attached to the characters while still being intrigued by aspects of mystery that they had for us. I think adding too many supports will mess up that dynamic. I know a lot of fans are already worried about Ianto not getting enough screentime as it is.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 03:11 pm (UTC)I know a lot of fans are already worried about Ianto not getting enough screentime as it is.
From what I'm hearing and just as a general prediction, given his popularity and the fact that that popularity has finally filtered through to the people in charge, I don't think that will be any sort of concern.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 04:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 12:22 pm (UTC)From everything that we've heard so far about Ianto's role in S3 - from Gareth saying that Ianto has "a lot of lines" in the first script that he's seen to Julie Gardner saying that we learn "much more about Ianto" in S3 - I'm not too worried anymore. I think RTD may have intentionally made the decision to bring Ianto even more to the foreground of the show, now that Owen and Tosh have gone.
PS - I'm very pleased about the lack of Martha. I don't want MY SHOW turning into 'The ex-Doctor Who Companions Show'. I want my swearing, sex and violence thank you very much.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 04:44 am (UTC)i didn't want her on torchwood
i still liked her though
no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 07:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 07:11 pm (UTC)I don't hate anyone for liking her, I don't even mildly dislike anyone for liking her. That would just be stupid, we've all got different opinions, surely?
Also, I don't know who you are.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-27 09:12 am (UTC)Never mind. :)