And seriously, guys...
Jun. 3rd, 2008 04:00 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
SHE'S HIS FUCKING WIFE!!
She's not Rose, she's not Jenny, she's not the Rani, she's not Romana. River Song is the Doctor's wife from the future. She's going to die in the next episode. He will spend all that time with her, doing all that funstuff in her diary, knowing precisely how and when she will inevitably die.
Paradoxes, inevitability, fate, curse of a Time Lord... Jesus Christ to hear fandom talking you'd think they'd never seen a Moffat episode before.
EDITED TO ADD SOMETHING I POSTED IN THE COMMENTS: I don't understand what everyone's so worked up about, she's not the next companion, she's his lover/wife from some point in the future. We'll more than likely never see her again. It's about time travel and the weirdness involved. It's about the Doctor losing the woman he loves, BEFORE HE LOVES HER. It's about her dying in the arms of a man WHO DOESN'T LOVE HER YET. It's a timey-wimey Moffat story, nothing more.
Moffat's apparent fascination with the mechanics of time travel make me tremendously excited about his tenure as boss. I think if Moffat does go for any sort of overriding story arc, it will be far more clever than Rusty's namechecking "Torchwood" every bloody episode, and will probably deal with the same themes he seems so fond of, fixed history, inevitability of events, consequences of past and future actions. I'm excited about Moffat, really I am.
She's not Rose, she's not Jenny, she's not the Rani, she's not Romana. River Song is the Doctor's wife from the future. She's going to die in the next episode. He will spend all that time with her, doing all that funstuff in her diary, knowing precisely how and when she will inevitably die.
Paradoxes, inevitability, fate, curse of a Time Lord... Jesus Christ to hear fandom talking you'd think they'd never seen a Moffat episode before.
EDITED TO ADD SOMETHING I POSTED IN THE COMMENTS: I don't understand what everyone's so worked up about, she's not the next companion, she's his lover/wife from some point in the future. We'll more than likely never see her again. It's about time travel and the weirdness involved. It's about the Doctor losing the woman he loves, BEFORE HE LOVES HER. It's about her dying in the arms of a man WHO DOESN'T LOVE HER YET. It's a timey-wimey Moffat story, nothing more.
Moffat's apparent fascination with the mechanics of time travel make me tremendously excited about his tenure as boss. I think if Moffat does go for any sort of overriding story arc, it will be far more clever than Rusty's namechecking "Torchwood" every bloody episode, and will probably deal with the same themes he seems so fond of, fixed history, inevitability of events, consequences of past and future actions. I'm excited about Moffat, really I am.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 10:52 am (UTC)River Song hasn't grabbed my interest as a character, honestly I'd forget her existence in two seconds if people weren't still talking about her. I'm more focused on wondering if there's any chance they might surprise me and Donna might actually be dead, and future appearances could be an alt!Donna from Rose's world.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 11:57 am (UTC)ain't that the truth, Rose doesn't even make the top five in my book.
let's see,
Romana II
Romana I
Sarah Jane
Tegan
Jamie (cause boy howdy, did Frazer look good in a kilt...)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 12:09 pm (UTC)i'll guess she dies in his arms because she'll throw herself in harms way to make sure he lives to meet her in the future...
Moffat at the helm could be incredible, it could also be frustrating as all get out- but at least it won't be filled with "aren't we so clever" moments ala RTD.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 12:25 pm (UTC)THAT'S VERY DEPRESSING.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 12:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 12:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 01:30 pm (UTC)And most probably from the Doctor's point to view the marriage ceremony will be the last time he ever sees her...
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 02:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 02:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 02:33 pm (UTC)The Doctor's wife closes off no avenues and she won't be important to the narrative. That's the whole point because you'd think she'd be all important as his wife, but because of how they've met, she's just not.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 02:55 pm (UTC)Come on. Book of his history? Calling it "spoilers", which is his rule? Told Donna basically the same thing about the biographies? Who else would know so much about his life? Who else, but an archeologist, could possibly write it?
Sure, she could be married to him at some point, or whatever, but that doesn't really matter. The fact is, she's his biographer, and that's what's going to be important for the next episode.
Also, consider this; constantly throughout this season, it's been empisised about time being stable or in flux. Events can, and probably will, change.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 03:07 pm (UTC):D
I totally agree about the thrill of Moff taking on the mechanics of time travel. A series about a time traveller that explores the astonishing possibilities and paradoxes of time travel. Imagine!
(I am, and its gonna be brilliant...)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 03:08 pm (UTC)Honestly, I thought the best line of the whole episode was when the Doctor is going all righteous and saying "I'm not going to let us all die because of one man's pride" and River calls him out and asks him why he doesn't just sign the damn form then. I wish Moffat hadn't had her soften that blow, because by having the characters acknowledge that the Doctor has failings and is wrong some times, it would stop some fans from having this perception that the Doctor is god and all the other characters must bow down and obey him.
People don't seem to like Moffat's Doctor because he lies and is high-handed with his companions and is sometimes insufferable, but I say bring it on. I like my characters having flaws and I'm sick of Jesus!Doctor. Moffat's Doctor is much more real to me than the Doctor in the Doctor's Daughter.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 03:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 03:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:06 pm (UTC)Now I will be mad if that does not turn out to be the case, as it is so much better (and copyright violation-y) than her as his wife.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 04:09 pm (UTC)Re: He doesn't handle loss well.
Date: 2008-06-03 05:24 pm (UTC)By "not handling loss well" I mean
-burning up a star to say goodbye to Rose
-the continuing emo complete with shoutyness
-hyper-sensitivity to people leaving him (i.e., the scene with Donna in The Poison Sky)
I will say this seems to be largely a New!Who thing, and thus probably relates to the loss of Gallifrey/the Time War, because he wasn't usually like this in old!school...hell, he locked his own granddaughter out of the TARDIS and LEFT HER. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 05:30 pm (UTC)I don't know. With all the mentions of "spoilers" and surprises being ruined on the show, I'm wondering if the River spoilers are fake, and she's his mother or something. Not seriously, but still. That and the bees.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 05:33 pm (UTC)Ohhh, man. That would be so incredibly cool after all the wife hype that I, too, am going to be disappointed if you're wrong.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 05:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 05:46 pm (UTC)And I know it's horribly sad to think about her dying in the arms of a man who doesn't love her yet, but it's the satisfying, beautiful kind of sadness - that well-written, well-plotted by a writer possessing the depth of vision required for creating real and affecting stories concerning the exploits of a Time Lord, sort of sad way. (Is it 2010 yet?)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-03 05:49 pm (UTC)