Dear All at Torchwood HQ,
Thank you for my big gay show. I love it, I absolutely do. I'm a ming-mong, and therefore I feel the need to state the thing about how much I love it, because, obviously, I hate the show. I hate everything about it. But that's only because I love it so much. Are we clear on that? Good.
Because I hate and love this show so much, I just thought I'd pop in a word of advice for whoever takes over from Chibnall, and it's this: That idea you guys had about not having a show bible? That groundbreaking and innovative and, dare I say, avant garde approach you've taken to continuity and just sort of winging it in that whole area?
IT'S RETARDED.
Seriously. Every single one of us ming mongs thinks it's the most retarded idea ever to have befallen a televisual production. And that's NOT because we're anal sci-fi fans who want to know every character's grandfather's name and date of birth, honestly it's not. We just think it would be nice to believe that at least SOME THOUGHT has gone into this show that we love and hate so much.
It doesn't even have to be a bible. Maybe just a piece of A4 paper, yeah? That tells you, and the actors, and the scriptwriters and the novelisation guys and the guys that do the website and the magazine WHEN CHARACTERS WERE BORN, WHEN THEY WERE RECRUITED and maybe a little timeline as to when sigificant events we have and haven't witnessed actually happened. Personally, I'm not that bothered that Ianto's been 26, 27 and is now 25, I don't care that Tosh has been working for Torchwood for a number of years that seems to differ every time it gets a mention, and I'm not even that worried by the fact that Owen being 27 when he died, given what we know of the length of his employment at the NHS and Torchwood, makes him DOOGIE FUCKING HOWSER, I don't care about any of those things, it's just that I'm AFRAID for you guys. I'm AFRAID that one of these days you're going to screw up so badly, you'll have to spend an entire season and not just one episode (Hello Fragments!) retconning yourselves out of the quagmire you've created. And nobody wants that, do they? We're only thinking of YOU, we're being totally selfless here. Give it some consideration, would you? Piece of A4 paper. Copy it, hand it out. No biggie.
And before you go getting all defensive on me and saying I'm not giving you guys enough credit here, I'd like to state my opinion, again, that I think in many instances we fans, even the ming mongs, are guilty of giving you FAR TOO MUCH CREDIT. I'll refer you to an observation I made in the comments of an earlier post, an observation about the Hoix Owen encountered in Exit Wounds, the Hoix first seen in the Doctor Who episode Love and Monsters (which, funnily enough, I love, I'm a ming mong who loves Love and Monsters, you don't see many of those, feast your eyes.) Now when we first saw the Hoix it was mentioned by quite a few people that the alien looked very derivative. It resembled something out of Alien or Buffy, and wasn't hugely original looking. I didn't see this as a problem at all. You see, I figured what you guys were trying to do was to tell me that, because we were seeing the story from Elton's point of view and he was recalling what happened from memory, the way the alien looked was also something that came partly from Elton's observational skills, and partly from Elton's cultural sci-fi conditioning filling in the gaps where his memory faltered. And therefore, in Elton's mind, that is what the alien looked like. I thought it was very clever of you, making it look all derivative like that, and making him think that it had been defeated by means of a bucket, which was obviously not the case but just a detail Elton had latched onto in his mind and given slightly too much importance to. I was happy, I had faith in the thought that you'd put in. And then Owen ran into one, and proved unequivocally that THEY JUST LOOK LIKE THAT. Way to go. So you see what I did there? I GAVE YOU TOO MUCH CREDIT, I thought you'd put loads of thought into that element of the story, when in fact this was not the case.
Now that's just an example of how these things work, and of course, I'm an anal sci fi fan, I put WAY TOO MUCH THOUGHT into analysing television, it's true. But sometimes you guys don't seem to put in ANY. I love a happy medium. Do you think we could strike one somewhere?
A piece of A4 paper and a photocopier. That's all I'm asking.
Yours with love and kisses,
Why A. Whelk.
P.S. Gareth David-Lloyd? HE'S A KEEPER. He singlehandedly saved the portrayal of the Jack/Ianto relationship from becoming a confusing mess with no more than a bit of body language and a cleverly raised eyebrow in those places where the script was sadly lacking and Barrowman was too busy emoting at Eve Myles FAR TOO VEHEMENTLY. Honestly. KEEP HIM.
P.P.S. But tell him to lay off the pies.
Thank you for my big gay show. I love it, I absolutely do. I'm a ming-mong, and therefore I feel the need to state the thing about how much I love it, because, obviously, I hate the show. I hate everything about it. But that's only because I love it so much. Are we clear on that? Good.
Because I hate and love this show so much, I just thought I'd pop in a word of advice for whoever takes over from Chibnall, and it's this: That idea you guys had about not having a show bible? That groundbreaking and innovative and, dare I say, avant garde approach you've taken to continuity and just sort of winging it in that whole area?
IT'S RETARDED.
Seriously. Every single one of us ming mongs thinks it's the most retarded idea ever to have befallen a televisual production. And that's NOT because we're anal sci-fi fans who want to know every character's grandfather's name and date of birth, honestly it's not. We just think it would be nice to believe that at least SOME THOUGHT has gone into this show that we love and hate so much.
It doesn't even have to be a bible. Maybe just a piece of A4 paper, yeah? That tells you, and the actors, and the scriptwriters and the novelisation guys and the guys that do the website and the magazine WHEN CHARACTERS WERE BORN, WHEN THEY WERE RECRUITED and maybe a little timeline as to when sigificant events we have and haven't witnessed actually happened. Personally, I'm not that bothered that Ianto's been 26, 27 and is now 25, I don't care that Tosh has been working for Torchwood for a number of years that seems to differ every time it gets a mention, and I'm not even that worried by the fact that Owen being 27 when he died, given what we know of the length of his employment at the NHS and Torchwood, makes him DOOGIE FUCKING HOWSER, I don't care about any of those things, it's just that I'm AFRAID for you guys. I'm AFRAID that one of these days you're going to screw up so badly, you'll have to spend an entire season and not just one episode (Hello Fragments!) retconning yourselves out of the quagmire you've created. And nobody wants that, do they? We're only thinking of YOU, we're being totally selfless here. Give it some consideration, would you? Piece of A4 paper. Copy it, hand it out. No biggie.
And before you go getting all defensive on me and saying I'm not giving you guys enough credit here, I'd like to state my opinion, again, that I think in many instances we fans, even the ming mongs, are guilty of giving you FAR TOO MUCH CREDIT. I'll refer you to an observation I made in the comments of an earlier post, an observation about the Hoix Owen encountered in Exit Wounds, the Hoix first seen in the Doctor Who episode Love and Monsters (which, funnily enough, I love, I'm a ming mong who loves Love and Monsters, you don't see many of those, feast your eyes.) Now when we first saw the Hoix it was mentioned by quite a few people that the alien looked very derivative. It resembled something out of Alien or Buffy, and wasn't hugely original looking. I didn't see this as a problem at all. You see, I figured what you guys were trying to do was to tell me that, because we were seeing the story from Elton's point of view and he was recalling what happened from memory, the way the alien looked was also something that came partly from Elton's observational skills, and partly from Elton's cultural sci-fi conditioning filling in the gaps where his memory faltered. And therefore, in Elton's mind, that is what the alien looked like. I thought it was very clever of you, making it look all derivative like that, and making him think that it had been defeated by means of a bucket, which was obviously not the case but just a detail Elton had latched onto in his mind and given slightly too much importance to. I was happy, I had faith in the thought that you'd put in. And then Owen ran into one, and proved unequivocally that THEY JUST LOOK LIKE THAT. Way to go. So you see what I did there? I GAVE YOU TOO MUCH CREDIT, I thought you'd put loads of thought into that element of the story, when in fact this was not the case.
Now that's just an example of how these things work, and of course, I'm an anal sci fi fan, I put WAY TOO MUCH THOUGHT into analysing television, it's true. But sometimes you guys don't seem to put in ANY. I love a happy medium. Do you think we could strike one somewhere?
A piece of A4 paper and a photocopier. That's all I'm asking.
Yours with love and kisses,
Why A. Whelk.
P.S. Gareth David-Lloyd? HE'S A KEEPER. He singlehandedly saved the portrayal of the Jack/Ianto relationship from becoming a confusing mess with no more than a bit of body language and a cleverly raised eyebrow in those places where the script was sadly lacking and Barrowman was too busy emoting at Eve Myles FAR TOO VEHEMENTLY. Honestly. KEEP HIM.
P.P.S. But tell him to lay off the pies.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 03:24 pm (UTC)You not watching Who, then? It is shinier than you feared it might be.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 03:30 pm (UTC)Gareth didn't just save Jack/Ianto he saved Ianto in general! I don't think I would like Ianto nearly as much as I do if he was played by someone else(especially if it had been an actor who got by just on their looks). Please let Ianto have a SL next series-a backstory wouldn't hurt.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 03:32 pm (UTC)He's pretty though, I'll give him that.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 03:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 03:50 pm (UTC)And then Rose was in it at the end, and then she disappeared. Lest we forget who Rose was. She had that awful blue plasticky jacket on and looked a mess like she was still emo over Ten lots and lots.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 03:59 pm (UTC)*wipes coffee off monitor*
That made it for me, right there.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 03:59 pm (UTC)Martha fans deserve a bit of fanservice after their girl was fucked in the ass by all last season's fanservice to Rose fans. The writers fucked that up but good.
I saw the pic of Rose and lol it looks like she's miserable after her fifteenth failed suicide attempt. So much for people hoping she was coming back to be kickass and capable and not fawning over the Doctor like a puppy.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 04:24 pm (UTC)thought i'd share a little cute factoid my friends at AC Nielsen sent me (wonders of having friends in low places). The tvQ ratings for torchwood (tvQ is a kinda ranking for characters in a show, plus combinations of which characters in a show have the most audience draw.) so far for the bbca run the most popular pairing is: Jack & Ianto. Second most popular: Jack & Owen. Third: Ianto & Martha. Fourth: Owen & Tosh. Fifth: Rhys & Jack (!) Mind, the tvQ scores were based through Ep9 so it did include the wedding! who is most amazingly MISSING?
in the single character ratings its pretty clear too. 1. jack, tie for 2: owen & ianto 4: tosh 5: martha
again- who doesn't get in the tvQ count?
(tvQ only does top 5 so i'm guessing the emotive limpet probably comes in 6th.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 04:26 pm (UTC)She's not a popular girl, is she?
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 04:38 pm (UTC)maybe the powers-that-be will look at the tvQ and get the idea that maybe they've gone a bit overboard with the "gwen must show us all just how human she is by emoting all over us" schtick. then again, they may completely ignore the tvQ data since the us isn't officially their primary market; but i don't think there's a comp reporting system in the uk.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 05:21 pm (UTC)Emotive Limpet. *snickers* I'll have to remember that one. I'd love to see what the score is for adrift.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 05:25 pm (UTC)If she got negatives for those episodes, she'll really be up shit creek for Adrift and Exit Wounds, I'd wager.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 08:04 pm (UTC)A little more continuity would go a long, long way, I agree.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 04:18 am (UTC)It's true, Ianto was most dashing in the first episode imo.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 04:53 am (UTC)I pity the poor person who's job it is to check continuity, not even the writers know what the back-stories are most of the time. Ianto doesn't even have one.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 05:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 05:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 05:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 08:21 am (UTC)and i totally agree, the fact that gwen gets to be so arrogantly self-centered and never suffer consequences for her actions just ticks me off to no end. i was hoping that there would be long term effects from adrift; but fragments and the exit wounds sure didn't show me any maturation of the character.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 12:23 pm (UTC)I endorse EVERYTHING. Where I can sign? ;)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 12:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 01:03 pm (UTC)Count me in, then!
st rose
Date: 2008-04-08 09:06 pm (UTC)your post = win
no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 06:00 am (UTC)There is a discussion going on over at DWF (Doctor Who Forum) about Gwen, and I really think these figures would shed some light. Would you mind if I posted this information over there? I can credit or not as you wish.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 01:25 am (UTC)Ianto probably would have been killed off by now or kept forever in the background if he was played by someone else.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 02:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 02:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 02:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 03:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 03:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 03:34 pm (UTC)And the other half the time, it's Kai Owen.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 03:35 pm (UTC)Mine too, he's like a big teddy-bear.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 03:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 03:37 pm (UTC)Poor Tosh. I was actually expecting her to be killed off at the end of the series, the writers didn't seem to know what to do with her.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 03:39 pm (UTC)Yeah :D Gareth seems to have a knack for comic timing.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-11 01:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-21 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-21 06:47 pm (UTC)I have no idea. I've given up excepting *any kind* of continuity from this show; both character development and plot line wise.
I read an interview on a Torchwood writer where they said they write a script with general characters in mind and than someone just cuts out the stuff that doesn't make sense. And than there is the fact that some of Ianto's scenes in From Out Of The Rain were going to be Gwen's, but Eve was too busy filming Adrift.