tencrush: (do not want)
tencrush ([personal profile] tencrush) wrote2010-01-01 08:51 pm
Entry tags:

Haha SPOILERS DON'T READ

In Russell's world, bumsex with Russell Tovey pretty much fixes all your emo manpain, no matter how vast, yeah?

That's pretty faily right there. Not as faily as that thing with Martha and you know who, but still pretty fucking offensively faily. As was that thing with Donna. Wow, that's a lot of fucking fail to heap upon an awful lot of companions.

DON'T LET THE DOOR HIT YOUR ASS RUSSELL.

Also, did Simm just disappear, never to be mentioned again, or did it just seem that way?

[identity profile] karaokegal.livejournal.com 2010-01-02 04:14 pm (UTC)(link)
OK, if you are one of those people who's rage or dislike of RTD has nothing to do with the Ianto situation, then I'm sorry and I apologize for the rile-up.

Howevere...there are locked communities, where people are reminded constantly not to share their views with the outside world (to no avail) that are completely and totally united in their hatred of RTD because of and only because of the events of CoE.

The self-same people have of late been EXTREMELY hypocritical, deciding that RTD is a bad writer and the scum of the earth, when they were previously heaping love upon him for the so-called canon-slash they thought they were getting.

In my case, I'm essentially only a New-Whovian and a Jack-centric one to boot, so yeah, I'm highly sensitive to that particular thread of the Who-niverse and that one point of the finale.

Which WAS the point addressed in the VERY FIRST LINE of tencrush's post, and by implication teamharkness's response.

I'm genuinely sorry that you feel RTD's work has harmed something you cherish. Meanwhile I've gotten four amazing years of Dr. Who, one good year of Torchwood, one so-so one, and a five-episode mini-series that in the end gave me back the character I'd fallen in love with (Jack) and the hope of future stories with that character.

As a one-issue voter, my approach to the Who-verse and RTD does tend to be a bit skewed and my reactions to certain criticism somewhat defensive.

However, you can't deny there is the equivalent of the VRWC that hates on the RTD for the very same issue.

[identity profile] love-jackianto.livejournal.com 2010-01-02 04:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I hope you don't mind me jumping into your post, but did you ever get those Due South dvds for Christmas? What did think of the show?

[identity profile] karaokegal.livejournal.com 2010-01-02 04:26 pm (UTC)(link)
I actually put them on my Netflix queue. We've finished the first one and just got in the 2nd. I posted about this at my LJ, thanking you by name, but I understand if that's not an LJ you want to friend or regularly read.

We love the show, the dog, the Benton/Ray dynamic, the humor, and the quirkiness. (Hubby has dubbed it "Touched by a Canadian.)

So thanks again for participating in Come As Your Not and turning me on to the show. Once we've finished more of the episodes, I'll go back and re-read the story.

Happy New Year!


[identity profile] love-jackianto.livejournal.com 2010-01-02 05:09 pm (UTC)(link)
'We love the show, the dog, the Benton/Ray dynamic, the humor, and the quirkiness. (Hubby has dubbed it 'Touched by a Canadian'.)'
Touched by a Canadian, priceless.

Thanks for mentioning me. We may have our differences when it comes to TW, but we really can love a quirky Canadian show.

'We love the show, the dog, the Benton/Ray dynamic, the humor, and the quirkiness. (Hubby has dubbed it "Touched by a Canadian.) '
Cool. If you ever do anything Due South related or want to check out the fandom, [livejournal.com profile] ds_noticeboad is a good general Due South posting com.

'Once we've finished more of the episodes, I'll go back and re-read the story.'
Just so you know, Ray Kowalski (the Ray in the story and the one in my icon) doesn't show up until the third season.

[identity profile] karaokegal.livejournal.com 2010-01-02 05:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Right! From TV Tropes, I understand that there's sort of a "Darin switch" in the third season, even though it's technically a different character.

At the moment, I'm trying to cut down on my fanfic reading (and writing) because I need to focus on the novel I'm writing so I probably won't be delving into the fic, but I'll keep the link should I have the craving.

Quirky shows are always fun. It's really a pity that Torchwood put so many people in an unfortunate position, because it should have been a fun quirky everybody screws everybody show, instead of a bastion of hard-core ship-warring.

[identity profile] love-jackianto.livejournal.com 2010-01-02 05:36 pm (UTC)(link)
'Right! From TV Tropes, I understand that there's sort of a 'Darin switch' in the third season, even though it's technically a different character.'
That's it. What happened was Due South was canceled after the second season, but then they picked up for a third season. By the time DS has been picked up David (the guy who played Ray) had already gotten another job. Ray Kowalski really is a different character from Ray Vecchio (right down to the way he interacts with Fraser); I don't like I would have liked RayK very much if he had been just a blond version of RayV.

At the moment, I'm trying to cut down on my fanfic reading (and writing) because I need to focus on the novel I'm writing so I probably won't be delving into the fic, but I'll keep the link should I have the craving.
Opps. I gave you the wrong com name. It should be [livejournal.com profile] ds_noticeboard.

'Quirky shows are always fun. It's really a pity that Torchwood put so many people in an unfortunate position, because it should have been a fun quirky everybody screws everybody show, instead of a bastion of hard-core ship-warring.'
I know. I pretty much left TW because the shipper wars got so bad. Fandom is supposed to be my happy place. Granted Due South did have it's share of shippers wars back in the day known as Ray Wars; apparently, if you liked RayV you couldn't like RayK (or vise versa) and Mounties help you if you were a Ray/Ray shipper. *rolls eyes* Happily the Ray Wars are little more than a distant, painful memory *knock on wood*

[identity profile] karaokegal.livejournal.com 2010-01-02 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm glad you've recovered. I know people who still have PTSD from their ship-war days in X-files and Alias fandoms.




[identity profile] love-jackianto.livejournal.com 2010-01-03 05:03 pm (UTC)(link)
'I'm glad you've recovered.'
Well the Ray Wars were before my time, but from what I've heard it was a long bloody war.

By the way, since you like Dief so much I while ago I made a Dief-centric picspam (scenes from all four seasons) contains a slight spoiler for The Wild Bunch.

(no subject)

[identity profile] karaokegal.livejournal.com - 2010-01-03 17:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] karaokegal.livejournal.com - 2010-01-03 17:16 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] coldwater1010.livejournal.com 2010-01-02 05:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Well all fandoms have their extremes that's just a by-product of the www and its unfiltered access. I generally don't regard that as proof that just because there are people who act that way that everyone or even the majority of people who like/dislike a particular character, writer etc. are therefore of the same mind. As has already been pointed out people like/ dislike things for a variety of reasons and there are a lot of valid reasons for disliking RTD's work that don't relate to a particular character death. His work certainly isn't above criticism. In terms of writing that applies more to Who to Torchwood since he only wrote two episodes of Torchwood, but since he's the producer/creator and by his own admission has a big hand in the decision making on the show if he's going to happily take credit for the good then he has to be willing to take responsibility for the bad.

Most of the criticisms of his work I tend to share and I think unfortunately these last few Who episodes highlighted some of his worst habits and Torchwood was always, unfortunately more about the character potential and moments than anything else and while I didn't hate COE for me if that was a reflection of the show at its best then I can't say I'll regret moving on. And unlike you Jack's 'progression/regression'? and in fact most of the Torchwood stuff was the least involving aspect of COE for me, a couple of moments excepted. Even the grandchild sacrificing was more emotive inducing than a truly emotional moment for me.


[identity profile] karaokegal.livejournal.com 2010-01-02 05:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree that no one is above criticism or reproach. And of course if it had all gone the other way in CoE and TEOT, I'd be the one building shrines (to real!Jack) and making snide comments about RTD's personality, love-life, weight etc.

[identity profile] karaokegal.livejournal.com 2010-01-02 05:57 pm (UTC)(link)
There's a couple of them arent there? Are the coffee-baggers even on about that? Stay classy, coffee-baggers.

I know you are not a coffee-bagger, and have expressed your concerns and dislike about their extremism. I highly respect you for that.

[identity profile] coldwater1010.livejournal.com 2010-01-02 06:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Well everyone vents in their own way and if that's their pleasure then so be it. That kind of wallowing doesn't interest me which is why I wouldn't frequent there even if they weren't closed any more than I'd waste my time frequenting rabid anti- Ianto boards since that doesn't particularly interest me either.

[identity profile] karaokegal.livejournal.com 2010-01-02 06:36 pm (UTC)(link)
It wouldn't bother me, beyond the fact that they have expressed border-line violent sentiments and started their harrassment Twitter campaigns. Also some people I care very much about are stuck in the hot-house over there and I feel like there's no way to do an intervention for them and remind them that there is life outside the Fight Club. :(

[identity profile] erinnthered.livejournal.com 2010-01-04 08:48 am (UTC)(link)
Seriously, watch this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI

It's brilliant. There are so many germane points throughout. For both the recent spate of Doctor Whos, and even a bit with Torchwood.

Also, yes, that thing on his face. Ugh.

[identity profile] coldwater1010.livejournal.com 2010-01-04 04:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Those videos are pretty funny. I don't even remember much that happened in Phantom Menace. Maybe that's why. And yeah if you have to explain in a post interview what was supposed to be going on in a scene then as far as I'm concerned you've failed as a writer. And I agree with his comment about tie-in books.They should be there as a side dish or a post meal coffee/ brandy not to make up for a scriptwriter's inability to write a decent, coherent script.

[identity profile] erinnthered.livejournal.com 2010-01-04 08:44 am (UTC)(link)
See, I still don't understand what any of that coffeboy nonsense has to do with Doctor Who. Because this post, and the last several, have been about Doctor Who, not Torchwood. I also haven't seen very much sympathy for that coffeeboy nonsense on this personal blog, so what you're saying just doesn't work.

Posts on a person's blog don't exist in a vacuum, just like Rusty's writing. Yes, her first line made some pissy comments about Jack's behavior, but I think you already know what she thinks about "saving Ianto," so why take it out of context?

You said it yourself, you are new to this, and mainly concerned with a single character. This is a blog post about a show that barely involves that character, and pretty much entirely concerned with the aspects of the show that have nothing to do with the character you care about. Why choose now to make a post like that? It seemed out of place, irrelevant, and made any accusations your were trying to make silly on the face of it. Seriously, Fight Club? You've lost all credibility.

[identity profile] karaokegal.livejournal.com 2010-01-04 02:37 pm (UTC)(link)
That is somewhat disingenuous. Who/Torchwood/SJA are somewhat integrated at this point. The Doctor appeared in a SJA episode and TW has deliberately referenced the Doctor. Since the first line of the post was clearly about Jack and not any other aspect of the episode and since Tencrush is a fan of Ianto, I think it's not completely out of line to assume her ire was directed at RTD for providing Jack with a new sexual partner and that she thinks there was grief for Ianto. (Having seen the ep, I disagree.)

My response was not to the main-post, but to Teamharkness' mention of the RTD hate, which has been vociferous since CoE, and most virulent on the part of those who are pissed about the death of Ianto, and specifically their resentment over not getting the J/I they thought they were promised. (They're now planning to send letters to members of the Government including the statement that they were LIED TO.) Yeah, hon...fight club. In fact they keep reminding members of their locked community, not tell anyone what's going on in it. (Luckily I have peeps on the inside.)

Coffeeboy Nonsense IS relevant to Dr. Who because the coffe-baggers are currently enraged about the brief scene in The End of Time and take it as personal affront to them and their cause.

So relative to the first line of Tencrush's post and the specific comment that I entered the post to reply to...yeah, relavent.

[identity profile] karaokegal.livejournal.com 2010-01-04 05:44 pm (UTC)(link)
You're right. I'm wrong. I'm sorry.

Given the craziness in the air *cough cough 400 page report,* it's still hard for me to read anything that seems hostile to RTD/references Capt. Jack without seeing it through the prism of the Ianto situation.

I appreciate that you are now on board with the real!Jack believers, even if you find that makes Jack unlikeable. To me, it makes him the Jack I fell in love with, who I was prepared to mourn if things had gone the other way.

I think the idea that a new shag of any gender or species as an acceptable way to relieve pain (be it man/woman/other) is very Jack, as we were given him from the very first episode. He's always used people...that's the first thing we saw him doing, presumably both shagging Algy for fun and being perfectly willing to boff Rose both because he wanted her and because it would help the con.

But regarding the specific issue of assuming you were attributing the moping (which as far as I could tell was actually non-existant until the Doctor showed up) to Ianto's death, mea culpa.



[identity profile] coldwater1010.livejournal.com 2010-01-04 05:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I think it makes him seem shallow and certainly makes his daughter's distrust of him that much more understandable. For a moment in COE I thought she might be being unfair to him and by extension Steve by not wanting him around, but apparently her assessment of him was right on the nose and she should have trusted her earlier instincts.

[identity profile] karaokegal.livejournal.com 2010-01-04 06:01 pm (UTC)(link)
No argument. He'll shag anything "if it's gorgeous enough." When his daughter said "You are a bastard," I thought damn skippy he is. Bastard!Jack is what I was afraid we were going to lose. And I'm convinced that Lucy heard her mother say it many, many times, because I honestly doubt that he was faithful to her mother or Victorian Wife or even possibly Estelle, although that might have ended before he could start looking around again.

Jack Harkness is a bastard. That's what Moffett gave us. And those of us who never had illusions about him or wanted him to be in a schmoopy-ooopy ship, love him for it.

It just amazes me how much of the CoE hate is framed as "Jack was out of character" when to me, it was Jack being exactly in character.

(no subject)

[identity profile] karaokegal.livejournal.com - 2010-01-04 19:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] karaokegal.livejournal.com - 2010-01-04 20:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] aviv-b.livejournal.com - 2010-01-04 22:51 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] karaokegal.livejournal.com - 2010-01-04 23:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] aviv-b.livejournal.com - 2010-01-05 00:39 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] karaokegal.livejournal.com - 2010-01-05 00:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] aviv-b.livejournal.com - 2010-01-05 01:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] karaokegal.livejournal.com - 2010-01-05 01:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] aviv-b.livejournal.com - 2010-01-05 00:50 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] karaokegal.livejournal.com 2010-01-04 07:17 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm all for the "other." Jack is omni-sexual---let's see it action. That would be a definite wish for S4.

[identity profile] coldwater1010.livejournal.com 2010-01-04 08:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Well it's doubly squicky because of the added implication of Ianto's possible emotional vulnerability. If he didn't want to get involved with Gwen because it wouldn't be healthy for her it's hard for me to understand his rationale for getting involved with Ianto. I know I like to accuse him of thinking with his dick, but it doesn't say much for his judgment as a leader either that he doesn't seem to have enough self-control to think it probably wasn't the best idea. (Of course with that line I may have just answered my own question). Plus while Ianto may have been more emotionally involved than Jack, Jack's the one shown pushing the relationship forward in s2 when it looks like Ianto may have cooled so I'd love to understand his motivation for that.

I think Jack's supposed to be a kind of anti-hero. A flawed man,who has done bad things,but also someone who at some point decided they want to do the right thing or be 'better'. I think that's always been his 'arc' which might be why it seems to have become something of a loop of late. lol. And while I do think he's capable of being a bastard or ruthless or a bit of a dick I've never got the sense that I was ever supposed to think he was remorseless especially since he seems to have a great need to atone and forgive.He clearly has issues. I tend to find him somewhat shallow, but I'm not convinced that's what I'm supposed to think so I have to assume the writing has failed him somewhere.

As for J/I when I'm not in a bad mood or letting my general annoyance with Jack cloud my judgment or just being contrary I don't really see it as 'just sex'. I'm not exactly sure what I see it as because sometimes reading between the lines feels like given the writers more credit for cohesiveness than I think they deserve, but there just seems to be too much baggage and too much of an attempt to create 'something' for me to buy it was all that casual either.