Entry tags:
Haha SPOILERS DON'T READ
In Russell's world, bumsex with Russell Tovey pretty much fixes all your emo manpain, no matter how vast, yeah?
That's pretty faily right there. Not as faily as that thing with Martha and you know who, but still pretty fucking offensively faily. As was that thing with Donna. Wow, that's a lot of fucking fail to heap upon an awful lot of companions.
DON'T LET THE DOOR HIT YOUR ASS RUSSELL.
Also, did Simm just disappear, never to be mentioned again, or did it just seem that way?
That's pretty faily right there. Not as faily as that thing with Martha and you know who, but still pretty fucking offensively faily. As was that thing with Donna. Wow, that's a lot of fucking fail to heap upon an awful lot of companions.
DON'T LET THE DOOR HIT YOUR ASS RUSSELL.
Also, did Simm just disappear, never to be mentioned again, or did it just seem that way?
no subject
Howevere...there are locked communities, where people are reminded constantly not to share their views with the outside world (to no avail) that are completely and totally united in their hatred of RTD because of and only because of the events of CoE.
The self-same people have of late been EXTREMELY hypocritical, deciding that RTD is a bad writer and the scum of the earth, when they were previously heaping love upon him for the so-called canon-slash they thought they were getting.
In my case, I'm essentially only a New-Whovian and a Jack-centric one to boot, so yeah, I'm highly sensitive to that particular thread of the Who-niverse and that one point of the finale.
Which WAS the point addressed in the VERY FIRST LINE of tencrush's post, and by implication teamharkness's response.
I'm genuinely sorry that you feel RTD's work has harmed something you cherish. Meanwhile I've gotten four amazing years of Dr. Who, one good year of Torchwood, one so-so one, and a five-episode mini-series that in the end gave me back the character I'd fallen in love with (Jack) and the hope of future stories with that character.
As a one-issue voter, my approach to the Who-verse and RTD does tend to be a bit skewed and my reactions to certain criticism somewhat defensive.
However, you can't deny there is the equivalent of the VRWC that hates on the RTD for the very same issue.
no subject
no subject
We love the show, the dog, the Benton/Ray dynamic, the humor, and the quirkiness. (Hubby has dubbed it "Touched by a Canadian.)
So thanks again for participating in Come As Your Not and turning me on to the show. Once we've finished more of the episodes, I'll go back and re-read the story.
Happy New Year!
no subject
Touched by a Canadian, priceless.
Thanks for mentioning me. We may have our differences when it comes to TW, but we really can love a quirky Canadian show.
'We love the show, the dog, the Benton/Ray dynamic, the humor, and the quirkiness. (Hubby has dubbed it "Touched by a Canadian.) '
Cool. If you ever do anything Due South related or want to check out the fandom,
'Once we've finished more of the episodes, I'll go back and re-read the story.'
Just so you know, Ray Kowalski (the Ray in the story and the one in my icon) doesn't show up until the third season.
no subject
At the moment, I'm trying to cut down on my fanfic reading (and writing) because I need to focus on the novel I'm writing so I probably won't be delving into the fic, but I'll keep the link should I have the craving.
Quirky shows are always fun. It's really a pity that Torchwood put so many people in an unfortunate position, because it should have been a fun quirky everybody screws everybody show, instead of a bastion of hard-core ship-warring.
no subject
That's it. What happened was Due South was canceled after the second season, but then they picked up for a third season. By the time DS has been picked up David (the guy who played Ray) had already gotten another job. Ray Kowalski really is a different character from Ray Vecchio (right down to the way he interacts with Fraser); I don't like I would have liked RayK very much if he had been just a blond version of RayV.
At the moment, I'm trying to cut down on my fanfic reading (and writing) because I need to focus on the novel I'm writing so I probably won't be delving into the fic, but I'll keep the link should I have the craving.
Opps. I gave you the wrong com name. It should be
'Quirky shows are always fun. It's really a pity that Torchwood put so many people in an unfortunate position, because it should have been a fun quirky everybody screws everybody show, instead of a bastion of hard-core ship-warring.'
I know. I pretty much left TW because the shipper wars got so bad. Fandom is supposed to be my happy place. Granted Due South did have it's share of shippers wars back in the day known as Ray Wars; apparently, if you liked RayV you couldn't like RayK (or vise versa) and Mounties help you if you were a Ray/Ray shipper. *rolls eyes* Happily the Ray Wars are little more than a distant, painful memory *knock on wood*
no subject
no subject
Well the Ray Wars were before my time, but from what I've heard it was a long bloody war.
By the way, since you like Dief so much I while ago I made a Dief-centric picspam (scenes from all four seasons) contains a slight spoiler for The Wild Bunch.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Most of the criticisms of his work I tend to share and I think unfortunately these last few Who episodes highlighted some of his worst habits and Torchwood was always, unfortunately more about the character potential and moments than anything else and while I didn't hate COE for me if that was a reflection of the show at its best then I can't say I'll regret moving on. And unlike you Jack's 'progression/regression'? and in fact most of the Torchwood stuff was the least involving aspect of COE for me, a couple of moments excepted. Even the grandchild sacrificing was more emotive inducing than a truly emotional moment for me.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I know you are not a coffee-bagger, and have expressed your concerns and dislike about their extremism. I highly respect you for that.
no subject
no subject
no subject
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI
It's brilliant. There are so many germane points throughout. For both the recent spate of Doctor Whos, and even a bit with Torchwood.
Also, yes, that thing on his face. Ugh.
no subject
no subject
Posts on a person's blog don't exist in a vacuum, just like Rusty's writing. Yes, her first line made some pissy comments about Jack's behavior, but I think you already know what she thinks about "saving Ianto," so why take it out of context?
You said it yourself, you are new to this, and mainly concerned with a single character. This is a blog post about a show that barely involves that character, and pretty much entirely concerned with the aspects of the show that have nothing to do with the character you care about. Why choose now to make a post like that? It seemed out of place, irrelevant, and made any accusations your were trying to make silly on the face of it. Seriously, Fight Club? You've lost all credibility.
no subject
My response was not to the main-post, but to Teamharkness' mention of the RTD hate, which has been vociferous since CoE, and most virulent on the part of those who are pissed about the death of Ianto, and specifically their resentment over not getting the J/I they thought they were promised. (They're now planning to send letters to members of the Government including the statement that they were LIED TO.) Yeah, hon...fight club. In fact they keep reminding members of their locked community, not tell anyone what's going on in it. (Luckily I have peeps on the inside.)
Coffeeboy Nonsense IS relevant to Dr. Who because the coffe-baggers are currently enraged about the brief scene in The End of Time and take it as personal affront to them and their cause.
So relative to the first line of Tencrush's post and the specific comment that I entered the post to reply to...yeah, relavent.
no subject
no subject
Given the craziness in the air *cough cough 400 page report,* it's still hard for me to read anything that seems hostile to RTD/references Capt. Jack without seeing it through the prism of the Ianto situation.
I appreciate that you are now on board with the real!Jack believers, even if you find that makes Jack unlikeable. To me, it makes him the Jack I fell in love with, who I was prepared to mourn if things had gone the other way.
I think the idea that a new shag of any gender or species as an acceptable way to relieve pain (be it man/woman/other) is very Jack, as we were given him from the very first episode. He's always used people...that's the first thing we saw him doing, presumably both shagging Algy for fun and being perfectly willing to boff Rose both because he wanted her and because it would help the con.
But regarding the specific issue of assuming you were attributing the moping (which as far as I could tell was actually non-existant until the Doctor showed up) to Ianto's death, mea culpa.
no subject
no subject
Jack Harkness is a bastard. That's what Moffett gave us. And those of us who never had illusions about him or wanted him to be in a schmoopy-ooopy ship, love him for it.
It just amazes me how much of the CoE hate is framed as "Jack was out of character" when to me, it was Jack being exactly in character.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Regarding Doctor Who, I really would have preferred that scene to have not involved a human man, but something from the "other" category.
no subject
no subject
I think Jack's supposed to be a kind of anti-hero. A flawed man,who has done bad things,but also someone who at some point decided they want to do the right thing or be 'better'. I think that's always been his 'arc' which might be why it seems to have become something of a loop of late. lol. And while I do think he's capable of being a bastard or ruthless or a bit of a dick I've never got the sense that I was ever supposed to think he was remorseless especially since he seems to have a great need to atone and forgive.He clearly has issues. I tend to find him somewhat shallow, but I'm not convinced that's what I'm supposed to think so I have to assume the writing has failed him somewhere.
As for J/I when I'm not in a bad mood or letting my general annoyance with Jack cloud my judgment or just being contrary I don't really see it as 'just sex'. I'm not exactly sure what I see it as because sometimes reading between the lines feels like given the writers more credit for cohesiveness than I think they deserve, but there just seems to be too much baggage and too much of an attempt to create 'something' for me to buy it was all that casual either.