EVERYTHING BUT THE BATHROOM SINK.
I'VE BEEN READING THE MEME! Well, how could I not, given the gossip. Stuff I have seen:
Yeah, I got nothing else to say. I'll do a picspam tomorrow. And a post about LOVE.
- I've seen a lot of people questioning the validity of the sink rumours. Maybe I've just seen a few too many skanky backstage parties, but I've got no problems believing any of this shizzle. It's not like it's actually earth-shattering or anything, Jesus. Nobody shat on a glass coffee table. Some people had sex. Big whoop.
- LOL, calling [NAME WITHHELD] a SLUT! I love it when that happens. See, from where I'm standing, the chick ALLEGEDLY had consensual sex with an adult guy she found attractive. It's not her JOB to know that he's engaged, nor is it her job to protect the reputation of whichever celebrity she fancies fucking. It's HER VAGINA, she can do whatever the fuck she wants with it. Is her behaviour a bit skeevy? Yeah, probably, it's not the sort of thing I'd do (Fifteen years ago, dudes? Yeah... perhaps. I'm not proud. But not ashamed either, MY business, nobody else's), but seriously, calling someone a slut for HAVING SEX, it's just not fucking on.
- Having said that, the righteous moral smackdown people are laying on GDL? Not cool. You don't know the status of his relationship with his fiancee. She might be fine with confucking. They might have an open relationship. Hell, she might have broken off their engagement two weeks ago because she's seeing someone else who has a more buttony nose. YOU DON'T FUCKING KNOW! It's not GDL's job to keep the fan community abreast of the ins and outs of his relationship, again, that's nobody's business but his. So, to a certain extent, STFU as well. If he is still engaged to the girl and she doesn't approve of that sort of thing (and yes, those things are LIKELY, but not FACT), then yes, it's skanky of him. But you don't know the guy nor do you know any of those things, so whatever dudes.
- LOL, there are people questioning the logistics of sink sex? Come on, guys. I've done a bit of research and apparently nowadays, the preferred height of a sink is around 33 to 34 inches. Given the fact that GDL is, what, 6'1", it would be safe to assume that his inside leg measurement would be around 33 inches, which would more or less correspond with the distance from the ground to the bottom of the base of his erect cock. So what's wrong with the logistics there? I mean, if you, the lady, scoot your arse forward a bit (and you'd have to, or you'd be IN the sink), you'd get a good inch of maneuverability either up or downwards just by tilting your hips, and then you can go with that old chestnut of wrapping your legs around the guy's arse, lean back with your arms on either side of the sink for stability or wrap one of them around his neck, it's all good. I can't imagine there would be any sort of logistic problem. It's just like table or kitchen side sex, except possibly at a slightly more pleasurable height (kitchen units are usually a standard 36 inches, people, 36 inches! Are you listening, Hollywood? AWKWARDLY HIGH.) AND ANYWAY, apparently only kitchens have a sink. Bathrooms have a BASIN. Its called a basin. The internet is a terribly edumacational place.
- GDL has a shirt that says "Don't ask me what it's like to kiss John Barrowman". This makes me LOL. It makes me LOL because when fangirls ask that question it makes me cringe because it's like they're saying "FEED MY FETISH, BITCH!", and when manly interviewers like Jay Leno ask that same question, there's always an undertone of "EEEW TELL US HOW GROSS IT IS TO KISS ANOTHER MAN!!" In fact, I have yet to hear that question asked in a manner that does not make me want to curl up and die. So good on you, GDL. It's a skeevy question. (The only other time people ask the "what's it like to kiss..." question, other than when talking about the ghey, is when the object of the question is someone that has been universally declared, by all of mankind, to be phenomenally, blindingly attractive. I don't know what this says about anything, it's just an observation.)
Yeah, I got nothing else to say. I'll do a picspam tomorrow. And a post about LOVE.
no subject
no subject
no subject
As for whether or not it took place, to borrow another Day One reference, I don't care. I wouldn't be surpised if he did, and I wouldn't be surprised if it was just some chicks making shit up. Doubt he is going to put a press release out confirming the situation so I doubt we will ever know.
I thought the two panels of Gareth's I attended at Dragon Con were good ones. Some squirmy questions as always, but I thought GDL was pleasant enough and, as someone else pointed out, not having a million "tell us what happens in the next series!!!!" questions made room for some interesting discussion. And, you know, some weirdness. But all in all, probably among my favorite GDL panels.
I can totally get his exasperation with being asked about kissing Barrowman. He even clarified it by saying it's just that anyone with the internet already knows his answer to that question because he's answered it so many times on other panels that are on youtube. I guess some people are interpreting it as saying he was sick of kissing Barrowman? Not the vibe from that answer at all, IMO. I think if they kept paying him money and giving him work based on kissing Barrowman, he'd do it as long as they wanted him to.
ETA: the tense in that last sentence should have been more he would have kept doing it as long as they would have wanted him to. In fact, he did. But anyway, he's always come across as very grateful to have been given the chance to kiss John Barrowman and the resultant increased profile for his character. I also did get the vibe, however, that he is well over being dead and is looking forward to new stuff. Just needs the new stuff to come along, and it sounds like it is perhaps beginning to. And in the meantime, cons and appearances will pay the bills and provide other...opportunities.
no subject
And a post about LOVE.
This made me LOL to an unreasonable degree. I am so sorry.
no subject
Hopefully the girl in question isn't going to show up at Gareth's place with a bad perm and bunny boiling tendencies.
no subject
Since then someone has aked JB: "really good for a straight boy" was the answer.
no subject
no subject
and re: s1 torchwood question, yes Carys gets in on in the bathroom of a nightclub while sitting on the sinks. (ironically that was just the episode that was on BBC America this past weekend.)
Nicole
no subject
no subject
I drink, I smoke, I swear. Granted, I don't stick my dick into willing fangirls, but if I had willing fanboys, guess where it would go...
Does that make me a bad person? I don't think so, a bit shallow, yes. But then who hasn't done some questionable things? I can be a bit of a cock sometimes, but I also try and do my best. Who can say they've never been a bit of cock?
Glass houses and stones spring to mind.
Kudos to Gareth for his portrayal of Ianto, and well done for being so totally human. He's famous, he's good looking, he may or may not have been under the influence - it would take a saint not to succumb once in a while.
no subject
no subject
It's a life half lived if it doesn't involve foolishness, booze and a cock or two every so often.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Two words. Height differential. GDL is what, six foot plus? Maybe he didn't fancy getting a backache ;-)
no subject
Max Clifford is good on that subject, he says how he has had celebs come up to him at parties and say "hey remember 10 years ago when I dated such and such" and he says, "no you never even met them, it was a story we made up for publicity" so even they can come to believe it.
Most of all though, I hope that if indeed he is faithfull to fiancee, then it really sucks if it's made up, which as I said, it really sounds it.
no subject
This tweeting thing is so strange, why are people at a party, doing whatever substances and tweeting about getting hit on by some dude from Torchwood, and their friend doing him in his bathroom? What happened to the good old days of just enjoying the party?
GDL's Cock
Perhaps tell him you won't pay for the ponies unless you get a 10 by 8 glossy?
no subject
no subject
As for whether G and his fiancee (if the engagement has survived) have an 'open' relationship or not -- well, in almost every society men are egged on to take for themselves the right to have an 'open' relationship, open for the men, that is, not for the women in the partnership. And that's not an open relationship, that's just hypocrisy. I'll console myself with RPF scenarios where the fiancee is shagging randome blokes in Newport pubs.