Of course there are those that see things your way. Just like there are those who believe that Janto (and yes I will continue to use that term- every term you don't happen to like is not derogatory) was apparent as well. And the characters are so ambiguously drawn that many different points of view have merit.
You might want to keep in mind that I have been a defender of your point of view on this journal. But you do not have the absolute truth to TW anymore than I do. So you might want to consider that the continual drumbeat of 'Real!Jack is back' is getting just a tad tiring.
Oh, and since I don't agree that your characterization of Jack is the real one, can I make a fuss about saying the Real!Jack term whether meant positively or degrogatively is a problem for me. Its not, but I just want to know if that Ok by you.
no subject
You might want to keep in mind that I have been a defender of your point of view on this journal. But you do not have the absolute truth to TW anymore than I do. So you might want to consider that the continual drumbeat of 'Real!Jack is back' is getting just a tad tiring.
Oh, and since I don't agree that your characterization of Jack is the real one, can I make a fuss about saying the Real!Jack term whether meant positively or degrogatively is a problem for me. Its not, but I just want to know if that Ok by you.