tencrush: (jackanto)
MAY I JUST MENTION FRANKLIN AND BASH AGAIN. Malcolm McDowell is cracking me up.

THAT'S NOT WHAT THIS IS ABOUT, THIS IS ABOUT WAREHOUSE 13. Now, I hear that it's kind of like what a Torchwood spinoff show called "Ianto's Archiving Adventures" would be like if it were written by those people who wrote Torchwood before RTD remembered it existed and turned it into po-faced drama. Plus, there are ARTIFACTS in it that sound ALMOST AS HILARIOUS AS THE ONES FROM BONEKICKERS. As you can see, I'm sort of toying with the idea of making it My New Show. Except it's not actually on anywhere over here, but I could always aquire DVDs and such. Apart from that, of course, GDL's in this week's episode, in a suit, but I don't know how much I need to know about Warehouse 13 in order to be able to watch it (this is series 3, yeah?) So... a poll is in order, basically, I'd like to know if I should be watching this show, like, regularly, and not just for GDL's pouty mouth. TELL ME.

[Poll #1767021]

Please to be helping me make my decision.

Huh.

Nov. 15th, 2009 09:25 am
tencrush: (do not want)
I went to post a comment somewhere and found I'd been banned from someone's journal. I've never been banned from anyone's journal before, and I quite like the person in question and don't recall ever having had a disagreement with them of any kind. Random defriendings by people who I thought were my actual friends I can deal with, but banning? Wow. Ouch.

Speaking of which, this is kind of where I am at the moment:
  • There's not a lot of joy for me left in Whovian fandom. I'll probably post something later about how much I hated Waters of Mars. I have no desire to watch anything RTD has produced or DT stars in, and I am only just managing to hold on to a scrap of enthusiasm for when Moffat and Smith come in. I hate Russell, I hate everything he's ever written, I think he's awful. His insistence on bringing all this emotional manpain and trauma into these shows that used to just be a joyful experience for me and, in the case of Who, for my kids, has ruined my fannish experience. I want the last three years of my life back, I wish I'd never started watching Torchwood, I wish I'd stopped watching Who. I don't need television that pisses me off and makes me sad, that's not what I watch television for. Fuck you Russell, I hope LA chews you up and spits you out and fucks you in the ass with a pointy stick.

  • Ianto did make me happy for quite a few years, which is why I'm working on a last epic picspam of my favourite teaboy doing shit. I hope to have it done in a week or two.

  • I'm also working on something of a personal project celebrating Torchwood Series One and Two, which I hope to tell you more about in the coming weeks. Or maybe I'll just abandon it.

  • I was hoping to do a Christmas push on the Ianto Jones Wants a Pony campaign, but the Lluest Horse and Pony Trust's continued inability to update me is starting to annoy me a bit, so maybe I'll leave it. After Christmas, I'm done promoting it because I think I've done enough. I'll leave it up, of course.

  • Any takers for [livejournal.com profile] ninja_teaboy may give me shout here or in PM. I'm putting it up for adoption per January 1st. If there's no-one interested, I'll close it down.

  • Oh, in case you were wondering, no. If there is a new series of Torchwood, I won't be watching it, as I don't really like Gwen, or Jack. I liked Tosh and Ianto and I quite enjoyed disliking Owen. I liked Ianto, I liked Tosh, I liked the Hub, the embossed SUV, the pteranodon, the old ladies, the poodles, the victorian lesbianism, the cyberbikinis and that stupid fucking invisible lift. In fact, I loved all those things. Apparently I loved those things far too much. Those things are all gone, so there's nothing for me to come back to. Not that there will be a new series.

  • It's been really fun, people, but if you've friended me for Torchwood content, please, feel free to defriend me in the coming weeks, I won't be offended. I am completely spent. Done. Thanks, Rusty.


tencrush: (thud)
I shall now attempt to start some wildly inaccurate and far-fetched rumours about The Hub 3 because I'm not there, and frankly, I'm appalled nobody has yet fucked anybody in or on a sink. Here goes.

GARETH DAVID-LLOYD, FORCED BY FIANCEE TO WEAR UNAPPEALING GREY-TINGED TIGHTY-WHITEYS TO CONVENTION IN EFFORT TO MAKE HIM LESS ATTRACTIVE TO FANGIRLS, FUCKS SHEEP IN SHEER DESPERATION.



Yeah, alright, I got nothing amusing. The pics are from the Casimir Effect website.

tencrush: (Default)
I'VE BEEN READING THE MEME! Well, how could I not, given the gossip. Stuff I have seen:

  • I've seen a lot of people questioning the validity of the sink rumours. Maybe I've just seen a few too many skanky backstage parties, but I've got no problems believing any of this shizzle. It's not like it's actually earth-shattering or anything, Jesus. Nobody shat on a glass coffee table. Some people had sex. Big whoop.


  • LOL, calling [NAME WITHHELD] a SLUT! I love it when that happens. See, from where I'm standing, the chick ALLEGEDLY had consensual sex with an adult guy she found attractive. It's not her JOB to know that he's engaged, nor is it her job to protect the reputation of whichever celebrity she fancies fucking. It's HER VAGINA, she can do whatever the fuck she wants with it. Is her behaviour a bit skeevy? Yeah, probably, it's not the sort of thing I'd do (Fifteen years ago, dudes? Yeah... perhaps. I'm not proud. But not ashamed either, MY business, nobody else's), but seriously, calling someone a slut for HAVING SEX, it's just not fucking on.


  • Having said that, the righteous moral smackdown people are laying on GDL? Not cool. You don't know the status of his relationship with his fiancee. She might be fine with confucking. They might have an open relationship. Hell, she might have broken off their engagement two weeks ago because she's seeing someone else who has a more buttony nose. YOU DON'T FUCKING KNOW! It's not GDL's job to keep the fan community abreast of the ins and outs of his relationship, again, that's nobody's business but his. So, to a certain extent, STFU as well. If he is still engaged to the girl and she doesn't approve of that sort of thing (and yes, those things are LIKELY, but not FACT), then yes, it's skanky of him. But you don't know the guy nor do you know any of those things, so whatever dudes.


  • LOL, there are people questioning the logistics of sink sex? Come on, guys. I've done a bit of research and apparently nowadays, the preferred height of a sink is around 33 to 34 inches. Given the fact that GDL is, what, 6'1", it would be safe to assume that his inside leg measurement would be around 33 inches, which would more or less correspond with the distance from the ground to the bottom of the base of his erect cock. So what's wrong with the logistics there? I mean, if you, the lady, scoot your arse forward a bit (and you'd have to, or you'd be IN the sink), you'd get a good inch of maneuverability either up or downwards just by tilting your hips, and then you can go with that old chestnut of wrapping your legs around the guy's arse, lean back with your arms on either side of the sink for stability or wrap one of them around his neck, it's all good. I can't imagine there would be any sort of logistic problem. It's just like table or kitchen side sex, except possibly at a slightly more pleasurable height (kitchen units are usually a standard 36 inches, people, 36 inches! Are you listening, Hollywood? AWKWARDLY HIGH.) AND ANYWAY, apparently only kitchens have a sink. Bathrooms have a BASIN. Its called a basin. The internet is a terribly edumacational place.


  • GDL has a shirt that says "Don't ask me what it's like to kiss John Barrowman". This makes me LOL. It makes me LOL because when fangirls ask that question it makes me cringe because it's like they're saying "FEED MY FETISH, BITCH!", and when manly interviewers like Jay Leno ask that same question, there's always an undertone of "EEEW TELL US HOW GROSS IT IS TO KISS ANOTHER MAN!!" In fact, I have yet to hear that question asked in a manner that does not make me want to curl up and die. So good on you, GDL. It's a skeevy question. (The only other time people ask the "what's it like to kiss..." question, other than when talking about the ghey, is when the object of the question is someone that has been universally declared, by all of mankind, to be phenomenally, blindingly attractive. I don't know what this says about anything, it's just an observation.)


Yeah, I got nothing else to say. I'll do a picspam tomorrow. And a post about LOVE.
tencrush: (thud)
First spotted on the meme, obvs. You think I don't skim that thing for luls (few and far between though they may be lately), you'd be wrong!

My personal headline:
GARETH DAVID-LLOYD HOSTS PARTY, FUCKS ATTENDEES, SINK INVOLVED. PONY CONTRIBUTIONS INEXPLICABLY RISE IN UNRELATED COINCIDENCE, SALACIOUS TWEETS DISAPPEAR. STILL NO PIC OF COCK, WHELK SAD.

I was going to do a post about something GDL said at Dragon Con in a panel, and I still will, but for now I leave you with the news that he's been sticking his dick in fangirls! Well, I mean, obviously this isn't the first time he's been sticking his dick in fangirls, but Twitter really has taken off in the past year or so hasn't it?

Social networking will be the death of celebrity as we know it.


Conclusion: 140 characters is not enough to accurately describe GDL's cock. DAMN YOU! Someone find me a picture.
tencrush: (thud)
[livejournal.com profile] jo02 asked me to do a picspam because apparently I AM THE DANCING MONKEY THAT CHEERS YOU ALL UP FROM YOUR EMO WOE ABOUT DEADIANTO.

Okay, then, I decided to start at Day Four. Not because I love Day Four because of loldeadness, but because, as [livejournal.com profile] cionaudha reminded me, GDL promised us COCK in Day Four. (I don't mean like he personally phoned me up and said "Hey, be on the lookout for my cock", but... well, yeah, that is actually pretty much what happened apart from it being at a convention or somewhere and there not being a phone involved.) Anyway, here we go, I bring you...

CHECK OUT MY FAYCE, A Ianto picspam from Day Four, with added cock and NO REFERENCE WHATSOEVER to whatever it was that happened in the last ten minutes. )

tencrush: (thud)
... about Ianto and posted them here. They are the TRULY IMPORTANTS things I learned from Children of Earth. I am now firmly on the course of TWISTING REALITY ITSELF to fit into my own worldview. Denial is a wonderful thing.

Now... back on track people, let's forget our troubles and attempt to work out if the events of the past week have taught us anything about the size of Gareth David-Lloyd's cock.

tencrush: (thud)
Random observation: I'm the first thing that comes up if you Google the words "Gareth David-Lloyd" and "cock". Let's keep it that way, folks. (Oh, alright, if you must know, I Googled those words SOLELY to test my theory that my LJ would be the first thing that came up. NO OTHER REASON THAN THAT, GUV. Honest.)

Speaking of which:
IS THAT A BIG GUN??? I guess this could be spoilers, but only if you squint and you think big guns and talk of hats are spoilery things. )

Anyway, just to keep up my Google-fu, let's all take a moment to think about GDL's penis and then get on with our daily lives.

See? Don't you feel better now?


Ah. As someone just pointed out, I am also the first thing that comes up if you Google "Gareth David-Lloyd" and "pie". Sorry about that, babe. I did it out of love. "Gareth David-Lloyd" and "penis" only gets me a fourth place mention. Arse.

FAILBOAT

Feb. 10th, 2009 02:05 pm
tencrush: (do not want)
This took me FAR too long, the animation is FAR to jaggy, the file's FAR too large and will take ages to load, but it's my homage to pornographic photomanips it is NOT WORKSAFE and it is entitled:

IT JUST WANTS TO BE YOUR FRIEND, IANTO... )

And I made it so that we may never forget the crazy that is out there. And also: COCK.

Okay, and just in case you're not aware of the fucking horrorshow manip that is the original, it's TOTALLY NSFW and it's here. DON'T FUCKING CLICK IT. I'm only telling you because she'll probably come along demanding CREDIT for me STEALING her ART or something, when it is, in fact, A FUCKING BRAINMELTING THING OF SHOULD-NOT-EXIST-NESS.

LOL

Dec. 21st, 2008 06:21 pm
tencrush: (thud)
Yeah, so I lurk around at [livejournal.com profile] who_anon every once in a while. I even post occasionally, though never anonymously because I'm just a dweeb like that, and also because I am more than likely entirely incapable of not sounding like me when I post, even if I do it as an anon. It's the commas, I expect.

Anyway, this exchange made me laugh far more than it should have and even brought a wee tear to my eye:

Anonymouse1: WHY DO PEOPLE MAKE THOSE CREEPY CHARACTER BEARS?! THERE'S NO POINT TO THEM AT ALL.
Anonymouse2: IT'S AN ATTEMPT TO FILL THE MASSIVE ACHING VOID IN THEIR LIVES THAT'S NEVER GOING TO BE FILLED BY GARETH DAVID-LLOYD'S COCK.

It's funny because it's true. Fucking bears.

tencrush: (thud)
Ah, yes, so someone says in my last post "It's almost as if you luff the Barrowman, you talk about him so much", and good God, ain't that the truth. For the record: I think he's a dick. I'm pretty sure we were clear on that one already. Anyway, to compensate, I thought I'd post some gratuitous and hugely pointless pictures. I cleaned up my computer the other day, and put everything in folders, as one does every now and again, and I ended up with a collection of Ianto-related Torchwood screencaps that I'd saved for reasons now lost to me in the mists of time. Probably because I was going to make an amusing icon or use the picture to prove some point or other, or maybe just because I wanted to look at it for a bit, I really don't know. But anyway, here are some of them, in no particular order:

IANTOSPAM )

Gratuitous repost, just because the holidays are coming up:

Man with gun. I'm quite fond of man-with-gun type pictures (even given the pie status here), which probably means that deep down I am overly fond of cock. Yeah, well. Whatever. Nice.

tencrush: (twplot)

  • In defense of me... First of all, I love how when I post something about Barrowman, it never gets linked in the [livejournal.com profile] torchwood_three newsletter, because it'll usually be about me thinking he's a bit of a dick. The Barrowmafia is strong. Not that I give a rat's arse, it's just something I've noticed.

  • Secondly, I've noticed that the extreme Barrowman love tends to come from Americans. I find that interesting from a sociological perspective, and I can understand where that comes from. A lot of American fans seem to find his out-and-out outness and happy-go-lucky lifestyle refreshingly different. As a European, I find it a mite tedious, and slightly overly perky and, indeed, American. I get outness on my telly and in my parliament and my newspapers and everywhere else on a daily basis, and as soon as you start going OTT with that outness, it strikes me as being a calculated exploitation of one's sexuality, which I associate with camp light entertainers and panto stars like Paul O'Grady and Julian Clary. But then, that's what Barrowman is. And the US doesn't really have Graham Nortons and Paul O'Gradys, and it certainly doesn't have that not-in-your-face outness of politicians and newspeople and actors and whoever that I take for granted over here, so I guess Barrowman is refreshing to a lot of Americans (As an aside, whatever happened to those uber-camp light entertainers I seem to recall the US having back in the seventies and eighties on things like Hollywood Squares and The Love Boat? Did they disappear into the woodwork out when AIDS hit? Did it cease being funny to be stereotypically gay? Were those guys ever really accepted as being gay by mainstream America, or were they just point-and-laugh funny because they acted gay? And why can't I remember any of their names?) But yeah, anyway, I can see why people think he's cool, and seriously, if you love the guy, go for it. There are far worse people on this earth to love, and apart from anything else, I don't think the man has a nasty bone in his body. Apart from the bone that would probably make a joke about the phrase "nasty bone", and that bone's just crude, but not nasty. And if he's got just one Torchwood fan who's never really been in contact with homosexuality and never known anyone who's gay and never really thought about it, to realise that it's okay to be gay and the world isn't going to end because two guys shack up and get a couple of gay dogs and move into your neighbourhood, then that's a great thing, because that's how it works. Go Barrowmanfans, go forth and be happy, I have nothing against you. I just think he's a bit of a dick. But that's just me.

  • A specific defense of me, not that I've been named, but I can read between the lines, I never claimed that Barrowman has corrupted the virginal GDL and turned him into a waving-his-cock-in-your-face-type monster. Though I did say something along those lines here once that may have been construed that way. Gareth David-Lloyd is a 27-year-old man and I fully believe that he, like most 27-year-olds, will happily and drunkenly wave his cock in anyone's face, stick it down anyone's throat and possibly even try to stick things up it for a bet just like any healthy boy his age, without the need of ANY encouragement from anyone else. What I DID say was in conjunction with all the hullabaloo surrounding the Hub convention, and it was that I think Barrowman, who's been around a bit and is, let's face it a lot older and presumably wiser, has been a bad influence on convention n00bs like Gareth and Naoko, not in inciting bad behaviour, but in giving the impression that this sort of behaviour is perfectly acceptable. None of that would have been an issue for me were it not for the fact that after that particular convention, vibes were being spread around the interwebs that What Happened At The Hub Should Stay At The Hub, and the impression was given that the actors' behaviour at said convention somehow wasn't palatable for the general public. And in that respect I'm probably just too much of an old woman, and more forgiving of the youngsters, in as much as I think Barrowman really is old enough to know better, and the reason I singled out Barrowman specifically, is because those vibes I mentioned were reported to be coming from him solely, and not from anyone else, which I found hypocritical of someone who so eagerly encourages the crudeness in others. In retrospect, like I've said before, I may have misread the fact that JB specifically didn't want his behaviour getting out. Not being a huge fan of his, I kind of misinterpreted some of the uberBarrowmanettes' tone of "JOHN TALKED TO US OMG I TALKED TO JOHN!!" as "JOHN is the one, out of all of them, who specifically felt this way", simply because that first interpretation doesn't really impress me and therefore I kind of just read over it and went straight for the second. But yeah, that's why I went for John. Make of it what you will.

  • Oh, and dudes, I've never claimed that Jack is a subby little bottom. I do, frequently claim Ianto is a dommy little top, which is a hangover from my glee at being proven right in my assertion, all that time ago, that Ianto was a manwhore who pulled the wool over Jack's eyes re. Lisa by distracting him with sex, but I've never once stated that that implies Jack is a subby little bottom. I really should stop reading the anonymeme, I know. I can't help myself.

  • TORCHWOOD SPOILERS )

  • Oh yes, and when Torchwood is axed, everyone will blame Moffat. Everyone from now on will blame Moffat for EVERYTHING. It's got nothing to do with Moffat, though I do believe Moffat wants nothing to do with Torchwood, but that in itself would not be an adequate reason for the BBC to axe the show. The hate for Moffat is strong, and it's completely unfounded, and it's only going to get worse and worse and worse. I weep for this fandom, I really do. I still love you, Steven.


As you were.

tencrush: (jackanto subtext)
If you luffff the Barrowman, maybe it's best you avert your eyes right now.

Man, this Hub convention thing is going to start hitting fandom_wank, soon, I guarantee it. A quick recap of events: Con organisers and "the talent" get together and tell the attendees that the piss-take play the actors will be putting on MAY NOT BE FILMED under any circumstances. Word is, actors will be FORBIDDEN to EVER DO CONS EVER AGAIN EVER, if video of said play is ever to get out (Yeah, that sort of thing happens a lot, right? NO MORE CONVENTIONS FOR YOU, BOY!!) Cue lots of hush-hush John-asked-me-personally posts on the communities telling people that's VRY IMPOTANT SRS BSNS that people report and tell on those who might be tempted to post videos of said play. Or the panels. No, wait, not the panels, the panels are okay. Right? Oh, no, they're not. Don't post ANY VIDEOS of said convention ANYWHERE, EVER, because PEOPLE MAY DIE AND CAREERS MAY BE RUINED if you do. If you see videos, AVERT YOUR EYES and report them to Showmasters, John Barrowman, John Barrowman's gay dog and the Secretary General of the UN. Are we all clear on this?

Between the lines, and mostly in the John-told-me-personally comments and posts, it becomes clear that, apart from the actual play business, for which it would appear there are legitimate reasons, Barrowman HIMSELF and his managers are slightly uncomfortable with the material of the play and indeed even the panels coming to light. Mention is made that John wouldn't want his nieces and nephews to see all the mankissing and pants. Awww, diddums, John. (ETA: So, obviously, AfterElton immediately devotes an entire blog post to [livejournal.com profile] smirnoffmule's pictures of said mankissing. And pants.)

I have a problem with Barrowman and I've said it a few times before, I think he's a man who uses his sexuality as an excuse to behave in such a way that would otherwise be classed as offensive, but because of his Big Fat Ghey, we all have to find it perfectly acceptable and are not allowed to say anything about it. In the past year of convention-going, Barrowman's asserted his frankly HUGE personality and old-skool-carry-on-risqué-sexuality all over the shop, rubbing it off on the likes of Kai and Naoko and Gareth, and frankly, along the way, turning wee Gareth, especially, from the convention wallflower he was a year or so ago, into a MONSTER of lewd behaviour and blatant sexuality (Oh, God, and that's ALL GOOD, don't get me wrong.) And yes, I credit (and blame) Barrowman for this, and for the way TW convos seem to be slipping and slipping further down into strictly NC17 places to be. And now? Suddenly WE are responsible for protecting his reputation as housewives' and kiddies' favourite. Piss off. You make your big gay bed and you lie in it, John, seriously.

I don't mean to offend what I know are a lot of Barrowmanfans out there, but this latest spate of "No, no, John doesn't want anyone to see it!" posting has got RIGHT ON MY TITS.

Sorry. :(

ETA: Let me clarify, before it gets confusing. I don't have a problem with JB's behaviour, I think it's hilarious. I have a problem with "Oh, that's just John's Big Gay Personality" being used as an excuse for said behaviour (and I think he himself has, on occasion, been guilty of that). "Gay" is not a word that means "allowed to wave his penis in your face". Likewise, I don't have a problem with Gareth's behaviour, which by all accounts is disgusting in the extreme. Great, I hope he gets his cock out soon and we can all sleep easy at night. What I have a problem with is the onus being thrown upon FANS to protect the public and the reputations of the artists from the consequences of said behaviour. If YOU, the artist, artist's manager, copyright owner of the show, think an artist's behaviour is unacceptable or will bring down the reputation of the artist or show in question, the onus is on YOU, the artist, manager or copyright owner to stop that behaviour from happening in the first place. END OF STORY.

tencrush: (Default)
[livejournal.com profile] smirnoffmule has posted some pictures from Teh Hub Torchwood convention here.

I'm reposting some here for luls, but go check out the originals. (ETA: Who was it that revealed to me they were majorly into thighs? There's some good thighage going on over at [livejournal.com profile] smirnoffmule's. Checkit.)

There was boykissing? )

I've not read many reports from said convention, apparently there was some BIG SEKRIT pisstake play put on by the boys about Torchwood and its Gheyness, and apparently nobody is allowed to know about or show or film it or whatever, and it would seem whatever it was that was said has stretched to people not even writing up reports or posting pics, because apart from these, I haven't seen any. WTF, man? I've seen complete filming of other conventions and I really don't think copyright protection or protection of the Beeb's good name is at play here, it just doesn't make any sense. TW's about the crack and the ghey and surely conventions, convention reports and even shaky crappy filmed bits of conventions on YouTube are just more publicity at the end of the day? Why the big whoop made about this particular sketch? THE ACTORS TAKE THE PISS OUT OF THE SHOW. Yah, dudes. That's not big news to me, or anyone else who watches. Honestly. Something's not quite computing here.

Anywho. Yeah, that's Gareth's bum.

tencrush: (thud)
More Torchwood filming pics. Again, taken by DOCTORWHOFORUM regulars Spaceygal, Sue and Alun Vega.

This time, they're a bit spoilery again, but don't worry, there's still COCK. )

That's it for today, folks. You may all return to your puny little lives.

tencrush: (Default)
I am utterly unapologetic about reposting filming pics, these, again, come from doctorwhoforum and were taken by Spaceygal, Sue and Alun Vega.

I repost them here
FOR YOU
FOR GREAT JUSTICE
and because there are no moderators in this here journal frowning upon the inevitable focus of the discussion that will undoubtedly arise. Without further ado, lets play: cock, cock, cock, ARSE!

Which is rather like duck, duck, GOOSE, only with cock and unexpected bottoms. )

IN MY MIND, the plot of this Torchwood five parter seems to be revolving around Ianto's wardrobe somehow. I'm sure that's not the case.

ETA: Regarding the last picture, the one with the arse, where do I apply for that job of Woman Who Carries Around The Big Book Of Iantoe Continuity Picshurz??

tencrush: (iantobutton)
Fic rec? What? Whelk does fic rec now? I thought you didn't read fic, Whelk.

Well, no, I don't really read fic, this much is true. But... having said that, I can't really resist a summary with the phrase dom!Ianto in it if it appears out of nowhere on my Flist. Just out of a certain scholarly interest, of course. I'm sure you're all well aware of my own personal dom!Ianto views, and I do, on occasion, enjoy seeing where other people go with the concept. Usually I'm disappointed, my own personal fanon dom!Ianto never seems to quite jibe with other people's.

But then THIS. This is called Snap Snap and it's by [livejournal.com profile] lady_razzle and YES. This is my dom!Ianto. This sucked me in with the story of the squeak and the WD40 because, dudes, THAT is my meticulous, thorough, slightly anally retentive dom!Ianto down to a T. I shall henceforth be pointing everyone at this fic if they can't get their head around my fanon image of dom!Ianto. WORD. Also, the last line made me giggle. Warnings: NC17, BDSM but nothing too gruesome, just some fun with a riding crop. If that's not your bag, baby, look away. But go read. It made me go yay.

ETA: Its prequel companion piece, in which a slightly bemused and completely unapologetic dom!Ianto has a chat with Gwen whilst looking for the WD40 is really quite funny indeed.

tencrush: (thud)
And now a post in which I attempt to convince you all that I am posting these pictures for the good of mankind, when in fact they are all about cock. Courtesy of Spaceygal, again.

TORCHWOOD FILMING PICS, not spoilery )

tencrush: (ianto pie)
I know many of you are too sensible and/or scared to brave doctorwhoforum, and quite right, too. Which is why I shall henceforth be shamelessly reposting filming pics from over there. I'll cut if they're spoilery. This one is not, unless you think Ianto's new coat is a particularly spoilery thing:


This pic brought to you by brian_damage at doctorwhoforum.

GNNGNNGNGNFFFFFNNGNGN.

On a more serious note, though, how small is the person whose legs we can see but the rest of whom he is totally and utterly obscuring?? I mean, I know he's a reasonably tall bloke, but still. Weirdness.

ETA: I am totally digging this Badass!GQ!Ianto thing. It's making me quite moist.

tencrush: (thud)
Isn't it nice when they start filming again? Hmmmm.


Pic yoinked from Sue at doctorwhoforum.

Gnnnffghghghgh.


As you were.

Profile

tencrush: (Default)
tencrush

July 2014

S M T W T F S
   1 2345
6 7 89101112
1314 1516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 20th, 2017 05:36 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios